From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 11 v3] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:13:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1363169607.3065.62.camel@Solace> References: <1363103170.32410.14.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1363108014.3065.35.camel@Solace> <1363109194.32410.81.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1363111707.3065.53.camel@Solace> <1363168428.32410.110.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0640474233075879428==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1363168428.32410.110.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Marcus Granado , Dan Magenheimer , Jan Beulich , Anil Madhavapeddy , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Juergen Gross , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Matt Wilson , Daniel De Graaf List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0640474233075879428== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pbbH3M9m3duRIveROrVV" --=-pbbH3M9m3duRIveROrVV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2013-03-13 at 09:53 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 18:08 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Now, were you saying that, since this collection of elements is, > > actually, a collection of bits && that, given the fact we represent it > > as an array, the elements of which are bytes, using "number of bits" > > would be more appropriate and clear? >=20 > Yes. >=20 Ok then, I'll go for it, since I'm respinning anyway. I'm preparing a new version incorporating yours, Juergen's and George's comments right in this moments. That being said, and as I think I already mentioned, having your and/or IanJ view (and, eventually, Ack-s) on patches 7, 8, 9 and 10 is the only big missing piece for the series to be committed (the v4 I'm preparing, of course, not this one, but still...). Do you think it'll ever happen? :-D Zero intention to push or to affect your workflow... Just bringing it up from time to time. :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-pbbH3M9m3duRIveROrVV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlFAUUcACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTfrwCfWx+xXDs13Key7NgJwfaz5Yoz KNAAnAo/5jRIYvNIu/2XKYv2x1XnlNKy =bfQT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pbbH3M9m3duRIveROrVV-- --===============0640474233075879428== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============0640474233075879428==--