Re: CAP and performance problem

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1314 bytes --]

On gio, 2013-06-06 at 10:57 +0200, Massimo Canonico wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 10:37 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On mer, 2013-06-05 at 19:05 +0200, Massimo Canonico wrote:
> >> Hi Dario,
> >> and thanks for these test.
> >>
> >> I forgot to ask you which xen version has beed used for your experiments.
> >>
> > Yeah, me too! :-)
> >
> > I'm using xen-unstable, pulled yesterday (commit id
> > e430510e5cbbfcdc1077739292def633e70fedea), compiled and installed on a
> > Debian unstable system. Dom0 kernel is a bit old, as it's a 3.6.
> >
> > What about you?
> xen 4.2.2
> kernel dom0: 3.8.11-200.fc18.x86_64
> 
I see. There shouldn't be much differences, from a credit scheduler
point of view (and even more so wrt the caps) between 4.2 and unstable.
Anyway, just to rule out all the possible doubts, can you build and
install unstable on your box?

What about the guest? PV or HVM? What's running in there? In my case it
was a PV guest, also running a Debian unstable, and using the same
kernel dom0 does.

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel