xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Massimo Canonico <mex@di.unipmn.it>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: CAP and performance problem
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:12:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370527977.18519.275.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B094D1.9010806@di.unipmn.it>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3168 bytes --]

On gio, 2013-06-06 at 15:55 +0200, Massimo Canonico wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 03:02 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > You added the boot parameter for the hypervisor, not dom0? 
> Fedora, after few seconds, asks you which kernel do you want to use. You 
> can add some parameter in the command line who launches the kernel. So, 
> I add "cpufreq=none" in the command line.
>
IIRC, that won't do, as you're most likely modifying Dom0 command line,
you need to be sure you're adding that bit to the Xen boot command
line. 

I think you can do that dynamically, by editing the grub2 parameters
on-line, as you're saying you did, but you have to make sure you affect
Xen and not Linux. IIRC

Otherwise, you should go to /etc/default/grub (I think), look for
something like GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN (I think) add the "cpufreq=none" string
there and regenerate grub.cfg by running:

# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

After that, I recommend double checking that /boot/grub2/grub.cfg has
it, and has it in the right place.

Feel free to post it here, if you're not sure about that...

> > Could you try:
> >
> > xl vcpu-list; sleep 10; xl vcpu-list
> >
> > when the test is running and post the output?
> >
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> here we go:
> 
> [root@csitest ~]# xl vcpu-list; sleep 10; xl vcpu-list
> Name                                ID  VCPU   CPU State   Time(s) CPU 
> Affinity
> Domain-0                             0     0    0   ---      23.0  0
> Domain-0                             0     1    0   ---      10.5  0
> Domain-0                             0     2    0   ---       8.5  0
> Domain-0                             0     3    0   r--       6.8  0
> rubis-web                            1     0    2   r--    2968.5  2
> Name                                ID  VCPU   CPU State   Time(s) CPU 
> Affinity
> Domain-0                             0     0    0   ---      23.0  0
> Domain-0                             0     1    0   r--      10.6  0
> Domain-0                             0     2    0   ---       8.5  0
> Domain-0                             0     3    0   ---       6.8  0
> rubis-web                            1     0    2   r--    2973.5  2
> 
So, rubis-web's vcpu ran for 5 secs, which sounds right. I see why
Jurgen asked you to do that, but not how he plans to squeeze anything
more than that from these numbers... Waiting for him to enlighten us
again! ;-P

> Concerning the George's question:
> > Have you checked your BIOS for performance settings?
> I'm not sure what you mean for "BIOS perfomance settings". To my best 
> knowledge, in the BIOS I have to be sure that the "hw virtualization" is 
> enabled.
> 
I think he was referring to something related to poerformance vs. power
management, i.e., cpufreq/speedstep tweaks, and stuff like that, if ou
have any in the BIOS... Do you?

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-06 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-21  9:02 CAP and performance problem Massimo Canonico
2013-05-21 10:41 ` George Dunlap
2013-05-21 10:48   ` George Dunlap
2013-05-21 11:54     ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-21 13:06       ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-21 14:28         ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-21 14:47           ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-21 15:26             ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-22 14:42             ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-22 15:39               ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-24  7:48                 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-04 14:03                   ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-04 14:25                     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-05 16:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-05 17:11   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-05 17:05     ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06  8:37       ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06  8:57         ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06  9:52           ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 10:39           ` Juergen Gross
2013-06-06 10:44             ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 12:52               ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 12:58                 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 13:02                 ` Juergen Gross
2013-06-06 13:55                   ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 14:12                     ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 14:12                     ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-06-06 15:27                       ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 15:42                         ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 15:54                           ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 16:27                             ` George Dunlap
2013-06-07  7:40                               ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-07  4:45                       ` Juergen Gross
2013-06-06 13:03                 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 13:09                   ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06  9:02   ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06  9:48     ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370527977.18519.275.camel@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mex@di.unipmn.it \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).