From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xl: allow for node-wise specification of
	vcpu pinning
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:15:45 +0200
Message-ID: <1373559345.12772.45.camel@Solace>
References: <20130711161053.27673.1199.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2224771011950065869=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130711161053.27673.1199.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============2224771011950065869==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-443llIfBB+LB/0f1HiPA"

--=-443llIfBB+LB/0f1HiPA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On gio, 2013-07-11 at 18:10 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Making it possible to use something like the following:
>  * "nodes:0-3": all pCPUs of nodes 0,1,2,3;
>  * "nodes:0-3,^node:2": all pCPUS of nodes 0,1,3;
>  * "1,nodes:1-2,^6": pCPU 1 plus all pCPUs of nodes 1,2
>    but not pCPU 6;
>  * ...
>=20
> In both domain config file and `xl vcpu-pin'.
>=20
And just allow me to clarify that this has nothing to do with NUMA node
affinity, neither with the specification, nor with the behavior...

I am working on per-vcpu node affinity (among all the other NUMA stuff,
of course), and I will submit it soon... It just is not this, ok? :-D

Here, I'm just introducing a new, and possibly more comfortable, way of
specifying vCPU to pCPU _pinning_.

Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-443llIfBB+LB/0f1HiPA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlHe2jEACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSMlACfSuPizrtCVdIssbz4TjpBNSC9
qksAnR08XOvHH/unxZE79OKqhjxZHmlX
=4lt5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-443llIfBB+LB/0f1HiPA--


--===============2224771011950065869==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============2224771011950065869==--