xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Gordan Bobic <gordan@bobich.net>, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.2.2 / KVM / VirtualBox benchmark on Haswell
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:27:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373560062.12772.48.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZYK+0Fxic9FzLR+7V08TDWSisELub_ib1m6jCk2C-e9ug@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1022 bytes --]

On gio, 2013-07-11 at 17:23 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Dario Faggioli
> > When I tried to use kernel compile as a benchmark for the NUMA effects,
> > it did not turn out that useful to me (and that's why I switched to
> > SpecJBB), but perhaps it was me that was doing something wrong...
> 
> In my experience, kernel-build has excellent memory locality.  One
> effect is that the effect of nested paging on TLB time is almostt nil;
> I'm not surprised that the caches make the effect of NUMA almost nil
> as well.
> 
Not to mention I/O, unless you setup a ramfs backed building
environment. Again, when I tried, that was my intention, but perhaps I
failed right at that... Gordan, what about you?

Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-11 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09 15:27 Xen 4.2.2 / KVM / VirtualBox benchmark on Haswell Lars Kurth
2013-07-09 15:40 ` Thanos Makatos
2013-07-09 15:53   ` Ian Murray
2013-07-09 15:56     ` Thanos Makatos
2013-07-09 16:14       ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-09 16:21         ` Thanos Makatos
2013-07-09 16:26           ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-09 15:54 ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-11 10:53   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-07-11 16:23     ` George Dunlap
2013-07-11 16:27       ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-07-11 17:49         ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-09 16:52 ` Alex Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1373560062.12772.48.camel@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=gordan@bobich.net \
    --cc=lars.kurth@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).