From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: [RFC Patch 2/2] x86/traps: Change show_stack_overflow() to use frame pointers if available
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:19:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375978750-25898-3-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375978750-25898-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Pass a full set of cpu_user_regs, and defer the hand-coded stack printing to
__show_trace(), which will correctly use frame pointers if available.
One issue in the case with frame pointer; subtracting two words from the stack
pointer and using it as a boundary condition might now result in a triple
fault.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 19 +++++--------------
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c | 2 +-
xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
index 324b0f1..05e5b74 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
@@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ static void __show_trace(unsigned long sp, unsigned long bp)
unsigned long *frame, next, addr, low, high;
/* Bounds for range of valid frame pointer. */
- low = sp - 2*sizeof(unsigned long);
- high = (low & ~(STACK_SIZE - 1)) +
+ low = sp;
+ high = (low & ~(STACK_SIZE - 1)) +
(STACK_SIZE - sizeof(struct cpu_info) - 2*sizeof(unsigned long));
/* The initial frame pointer. */
@@ -316,11 +316,11 @@ void show_stack(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
show_trace(regs);
}
-void show_stack_overflow(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long esp)
+void show_stack_overflow(unsigned int cpu, const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
#ifdef MEMORY_GUARD
+ unsigned long esp = regs->rsp;
unsigned long esp_top, esp_bottom;
- unsigned long *stack, addr;
esp_bottom = (esp | (STACK_SIZE - 1)) + 1;
esp_top = esp_bottom - PRIMARY_STACK_SIZE;
@@ -343,16 +343,7 @@ void show_stack_overflow(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long esp)
printk("Xen stack overflow (dumping trace %p-%p):\n ",
(void *)esp, (void *)esp_bottom);
- stack = (unsigned long *)esp;
- while ( ((long)stack & (STACK_SIZE-BYTES_PER_LONG)) != 0 )
- {
- addr = *stack++;
- if ( is_active_kernel_text(addr) )
- {
- printk("%p: [<%p>]", stack, _p(addr));
- print_symbol(" %s\n ", addr);
- }
- }
+ __show_trace(esp, regs->rbp);
printk("\n");
#endif
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c
index bcd7609..385b366 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ void do_double_fault(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
printk("CPU: %d\n", cpu);
_show_registers(regs, crs, CTXT_hypervisor, NULL);
- show_stack_overflow(cpu, regs->rsp);
+ show_stack_overflow(cpu, regs);
panic("DOUBLE FAULT -- system shutdown\n");
}
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
index 5cdacc7..d050bac 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ extern always_inline void prefetchw(const void *x)
#endif
void show_stack(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
-void show_stack_overflow(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long esp);
+void show_stack_overflow(unsigned int cpu, const struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
void show_registers(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
void show_execution_state(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
#define dump_execution_state() run_in_exception_handler(show_execution_state)
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-08 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-08 16:19 [RFC Patch 0/2] Improvements to stack traces Andrew Cooper
2013-08-08 16:19 ` [RFC Patch 1/2] x86/traps: Refactor show_trace() Andrew Cooper
2013-08-08 16:19 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-08-08 17:23 ` [RFC Patch 0/2] Improvements to stack traces Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375978750-25898-3-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).