From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: patches@linaro.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/7] xen/arm: gic: Use the correct CPU ID
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:09:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380193781-17474-5-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380193781-17474-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>
The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the logical
CPU numbering.
When Xen wants to send an SGI to specific CPU, it needs to use the GIC CPU ID.
It can be retrieved from ITARGETSR0, in fact when this field is read, the GIC
will return a value that corresponds only to the processor reading the register.
So Xen can use the PPI 0 to initialize the mapping.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v5:
- Remove the per_cpu ASSERT.
Changes in v4:
- Make logical and between the cpumask given in arguments and
cpu_possible_map.
- Make sure the per_cpu is initialized
- Add comment restriction for gic_set_irq_properties
Changes in v3:
- Correctly create the mask in gic_cpu_mask
Changes in v2:
- Use per-cpu variable instead of an array
- Add comment for NR_GIC_CPU_IF
---
xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index b969d23..05685cd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -57,6 +57,31 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint64_t, lr_mask);
static unsigned nr_lrs;
+/* The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the
+ * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC
+ * itself
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, gic_cpu_id);
+
+/* Maximum cpu interface per GIC */
+#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8
+
+static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ unsigned int mask = 0;
+ cpumask_t possible_mask;
+
+ cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map);
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &possible_mask)
+ {
+ ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF);
+ mask |= per_cpu(gic_cpu_id, cpu);
+ }
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
unsigned int gic_number_lines(void)
{
return gic.lines;
@@ -182,16 +207,18 @@ static hw_irq_controller gic_guest_irq_type = {
.set_affinity = gic_irq_set_affinity,
};
-/* needs to be called with gic.lock held */
+/*
+ * - needs to be called with gic.lock held
+ * - needs to be called with a valid cpu_mask, ie each cpu in the mask has
+ * already called gic_cpu_init
+ */
static void gic_set_irq_properties(unsigned int irq, bool_t level,
const cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
unsigned int priority)
{
volatile unsigned char *bytereg;
uint32_t cfg, edgebit;
- unsigned int mask = cpumask_bits(cpu_mask)[0];
-
- ASSERT(!(mask & ~0xff)); /* Target bitmap only support 8 CPUS */
+ unsigned int mask = gic_cpu_mask(cpu_mask);
/* Set edge / level */
cfg = GICD[GICD_ICFGR + irq / 16];
@@ -300,6 +327,8 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(void)
{
int i;
+ this_cpu(gic_cpu_id) = GICD[GICD_ITARGETSR] & 0xff;
+
/* The first 32 interrupts (PPI and SGI) are banked per-cpu, so
* even though they are controlled with GICD registers, they must
* be set up here with the other per-cpu state. */
@@ -431,13 +460,13 @@ void __init gic_init(void)
void send_SGI_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask, enum gic_sgi sgi)
{
- unsigned long mask = cpumask_bits(cpumask)[0];
+ unsigned int mask = 0;
+ cpumask_t online_mask;
ASSERT(sgi < 16); /* There are only 16 SGIs */
- mask &= cpumask_bits(&cpu_online_map)[0];
-
- ASSERT(mask < 0x100); /* The target bitmap only supports 8 CPUs */
+ cpumask_and(&online_mask, cpumask, &cpu_online_map);
+ mask = gic_cpu_mask(&online_mask);
dsb();
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 11:09 [PATCH v5 0/7] Dissociate logical and gic/hardware CPU ID Julien Grall
2013-09-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] xen/arm: Introduce init_info structure Julien Grall
2013-09-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] xen/arm: use cpumask_t to describe cpu mask in gic_route_dt_irq Julien Grall
2013-09-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] xen/arm: Initialize correctly IRQ routing Julien Grall
2013-09-26 11:09 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2013-09-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] xen/arm: Fix assert in send_SGI_one Julien Grall
2013-09-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] xen/arm: Dissociate logical and hardware CPU ID Julien Grall
2013-09-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] xen/arm: Use the hardware ID to boot correctly secondary cpus Julien Grall
2013-09-26 15:09 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Dissociate logical and gic/hardware CPU ID Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380193781-17474-5-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).