From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] common/spinlock: Ensure the flags parameter is wide enough
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:41:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382362893-12603-4-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382362893-12603-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Because of the construction of spin_lock_irq() (and varients), the flags
parameter could be trucated. Use a BUILD_BUG_ON() to verify the width of the
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
---
The previous patch in the series fixes the compilation issues I found as a
result of this patch, but I have not tested on arm. I therefore request an
explicit ack from an arm maintainer before this is committed.
---
xen/include/xen/spinlock.h | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h b/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h
index 76581c5..12b0a89 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h
@@ -188,7 +188,11 @@ int _rw_is_write_locked(rwlock_t *lock);
#define spin_lock(l) _spin_lock(l)
#define spin_lock_irq(l) _spin_lock_irq(l)
-#define spin_lock_irqsave(l, f) ((f) = _spin_lock_irqsave(l))
+#define spin_lock_irqsave(l, f) \
+ ({ \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(f) != sizeof(unsigned long)); \
+ ((f) = _spin_lock_irqsave(l)); \
+ })
#define spin_unlock(l) _spin_unlock(l)
#define spin_unlock_irq(l) _spin_unlock_irq(l)
@@ -220,7 +224,11 @@ int _rw_is_write_locked(rwlock_t *lock);
#define read_lock(l) _read_lock(l)
#define read_lock_irq(l) _read_lock_irq(l)
-#define read_lock_irqsave(l, f) ((f) = _read_lock_irqsave(l))
+#define read_lock_irqsave(l, f) \
+ ({ \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(f) != sizeof(unsigned long)); \
+ ((f) = _read_lock_irqsave(l)); \
+ })
#define read_unlock(l) _read_unlock(l)
#define read_unlock_irq(l) _read_unlock_irq(l)
@@ -229,7 +237,11 @@ int _rw_is_write_locked(rwlock_t *lock);
#define write_lock(l) _write_lock(l)
#define write_lock_irq(l) _write_lock_irq(l)
-#define write_lock_irqsave(l, f) ((f) = _write_lock_irqsave(l))
+#define write_lock_irqsave(l, f) \
+ ({ \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(f) != sizeof(unsigned long)); \
+ ((f) = _write_lock_irqsave(l)); \
+ })
#define write_trylock(l) _write_trylock(l)
#define write_unlock(l) _write_unlock(l)
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 13:41 [PATCH 0/3] irqsave/restore improvements Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: local_irq_restore() should not blindly popf Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 13:58 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-21 14:09 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-21 14:32 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 15:24 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 16:33 ` [Patch 1/3 v2] " Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 18:18 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-21 18:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 18:37 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-22 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-22 8:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-22 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-22 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] " Andrew Cooper
2013-10-22 13:27 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-29 14:53 ` [Patch 1/3 v2] " Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: Widen flags parameter for spinlock_irqsave() and friends Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 13:41 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-10-21 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] common/spinlock: Ensure the flags parameter is wide enough Ian Campbell
2013-10-21 14:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] irqsave/restore improvements Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382362893-12603-4-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).