From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Stash debug symbols for build results Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:49:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1383238168.25018.138.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: <1382711304-9218-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <21102.34503.279602.121530@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1383221674.25018.13.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1383224379.25018.42.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <21106.26010.788050.450530@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <527266E5.9030809@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <527266E5.9030809@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:19 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 31/10/13 14:13, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST] Stash debug symbols for build results"): > >> Result is 30M uncompressed, 13M gzip compressed. Good enough? (with > >> compression I assume). > > Yes, I think so. > > > > Ian. > > If you are concerned with space as opposed to {en/de}compressing time, > why not choose something like bzip2 which is slower but generally more > space efficient? bzip2 saves ~0.25M out of a ~13M compressed file. I've already written the serial and am about to post so I don't think it is worth it ;-) Ian.