From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] xen: numa-sched: leave node-affinity alone if not in "auto" mode Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1383662947.9207.61.camel@Solace> References: <20131003174413.28472.8989.stgit@Solace> <20131003174555.28472.67383.stgit@Solace> <5278FECC.4040703@eu.citrix.com> <527910BF02000078000FFA29@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7012661518922764042==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <527910BF02000078000FFA29@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Marcus Granado , Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Li Yechen , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , JuergenGross , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Matt Wilson , Justin Weaver , Daniel De Graaf , Elena Ufimtseva List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7012661518922764042== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-j3so2xqJCjNyyTR/5sa3" --=-j3so2xqJCjNyyTR/5sa3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2013-11-05 at 14:37 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 05.11.13 at 15:21, George Dunlap wro= te: > > Kier / Jan: And as this is actually independent of the rest of the=20 > > series, and already has my reviewed-by, it can be applied right now=20 > > without waiting for the rest of the series to be reviewed. >=20 > Right. It needs Keir's ack in any case. >=20 Ok. > But then again this was patch 3 in a series posted over a month > ago (and being a mishmash of hypervisor and tools patches), so > I would have > - considered it stale by now, expecting a re-submission > Which I just did. :-) > - expected to be told that it can be applied on its own >=20 Yeah, this comes from the fact that I included it in the series (to which it is relevant, but not related, I'd say). I tried to put that info in the changelog, but it perhaps wasn't explicit and easy enough to catch. I submitted the patch before (alone and outside of any series) and, when it came to sending out the series, I embedded it there trying to minimize the possibilities of conflicts that could waste people's time, depending on which one among the patch and the series was being applied first. Sorry... I was just trying to make life as easy as possible for everyone. :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-j3so2xqJCjNyyTR/5sa3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlJ5BWMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ6/ACghjn/ywSnUew3NHSiv6p4yNdd rjAAnRVdRjQyIPmAdl9ePLcVmy8R2FKO =PNd5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-j3so2xqJCjNyyTR/5sa3-- --===============7012661518922764042== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============7012661518922764042==--