From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1384439823.16918.64.camel@Solace> References: <20131113190852.18086.5437.stgit@Solace> <20131113191114.18086.91666.stgit@Solace> <21124.56613.303742.609821@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1975998967770852515==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21124.56613.303742.609821@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Marcus Granado , Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Li Yechen , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Juergen Gross , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich , Justin Weaver , Matt Wilson , Elena Ufimtseva List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1975998967770852515== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-q45o126uFZ9HeLxEWszx" --=-q45o126uFZ9HeLxEWszx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2013-11-14 at 14:24 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH v2 02/16] xl: allow for node-wise specific= ation of vcpu pinning"): > > Making it possible to use something like the following: > > * "nodes:0-3": all pCPUs of nodes 0,1,2,3; > > * "nodes:0-3,^node:2": all pCPUS of nodes 0,1,3; > > * "1,nodes:1-2,^6": pCPU 1 plus all pCPUs of nodes 1,2 > > but not pCPU 6; > ... > > * fixing the handling (well, the rejection, actually) of > > "^all" and "^nodes:all"; >=20 > If it were me I would have made ^all and ^nodes:all work, rather than > rejecting them. That makes it possible for > semi-automaticallyy-generated configs to specify > "blah,blah,^all,1-3" > to override the first part. >=20 Oh, I see... No, sorry, I completely failed at spotting the possibility of enabling such an use-case. Now that you mention it, I see it exists and could be useful, although, probably, not very common. > But that's not really important. >=20 Yeah, I think so. Anyway, it's nothing that can't be done with a follow-up patch, once this series is in (/me adds it to my my TODO list. :-) ) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-q45o126uFZ9HeLxEWszx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlKE4BAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQTogCfZRetJqL0GLpDOihIpdqEb/g5 uUUAnj56P0vi/0Q1/c960vRQ6GOMAzx4 =IWin -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-q45o126uFZ9HeLxEWszx-- --===============1975998967770852515== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============1975998967770852515==--