From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] xen: sched: make space for
	cpu_soft_affinity
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:14:16 +0100
Message-ID: <1384445656.29902.158.camel@Abyss>
References: <20131113190852.18086.5437.stgit@Solace>
	<20131113191151.18086.37783.stgit@Solace>
	<5284E655.3060308@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4885126041330921883=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5284E655.3060308@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Li Yechen <lccycc123@gmail.com>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>, Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============4885126041330921883==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OsibYH83SFIdn3qEqRw+"

--=-OsibYH83SFIdn3qEqRw+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On gio, 2013-11-14 at 15:03 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> The breakdown of this in the series doesn't make much sense to me -- I=
=20
> would have folded this one and patch 10 (use soft affinity instead of=20
> node affinity) together, and put it in after patch 07=20
> (s/affinity/hard_affinity/g;).
>=20
I see. Well, looks like I'm respinning it. While at it, I'll see if I
can put it that way.

If I do (and provided that does not imply any code change in those
patches), can I retain your Reviewed-by tag in the result?

> But the code itself is fine, and time is short, so:
>=20
> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
>=20

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-OsibYH83SFIdn3qEqRw+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlKE9tgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQYCQCeL+xJLXuwOfNI3SoTvrVeaMrq
NrUAnRxBtjOe8W0CsHm0nZXFEqOaY83A
=5pn+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OsibYH83SFIdn3qEqRw+--


--===============4885126041330921883==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============4885126041330921883==--