xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Li Yechen <lccycc123@gmail.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] libxl: get and set soft affinity
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:13:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384492401.16918.124.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21124.63867.762364.416870@mariner.uk.xensource.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3931 bytes --]

On gio, 2013-11-14 at 16:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] libxl: get and set soft affinity"):
> > On 14/11/13 15:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > So perhaps we should have a singe function that can change the
> > > cpupool, hard affinity, and soft affinity, all at once ?
> > 
> > I think this is probably a good idea.  Would it make sense to basically 
> > have libxl_[gs]et_vcpuaffinity2(), which takes a parameter that can 
> > specify that the mask is for either hard, soft, or both?
> 
> No, it needs to take at least two separate parameters for the hard and
> soft masks, because the toolstack might want to set the hard affinity
> and soft affinity to different values, without having to think
> carefully about ordering these calls to avoid generating spurious
> warnings and incompatible arrangements.
> 
Ok, what about if I provide both?

Something like this:

int libxl_set_vcpuaffinity2(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid, uint32_t vcpuid,
                            const libxl_bitmap *cpumap, int flags)
{
    flags & HARD
        <set_hard_affinity>(domid, vcpuid, cpumap)
    flags & SOFT
        <set_soft_affinity>(domid, vcpuid, cpumap)

    <check_ecpumap_out_and_warn>
}

int libxl_set_vcpuaffinity3(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid, uint32_t vcpuid,
                            const libxl_bitmap *cpumap_hard,
                            const libxl_bitmap *cpumap_soft)
{
    <set_hard_affinity>(domid, vcpuid, cpumap_hard)

    <set_soft_affinity>(domid, vcpuid, cpumap_soft)

    <check_ecpumap_out_and_warn>
}

This ought to allow both the use case:
 1. when one is only want to change one (or both to the same value),
    and is ok with being WARN'ed if that result in an inconsistent state
 2. when one wants to land directly in a specific state, which requires
    changing both, each one to its own value, and only want to be
    WARN'ed _iff_ that final state is inconsistent

I've already an half backed updated series doing right this, but I'll be
working far from my testbox in the morning, so I'll complete the testing
and send it in the afternoon, ok?

> I think this probably applies to cpupool changes too.  So perhaps the
> function should look a bit like setresuid or something: it should take
> an optional new cpupool (is there a sentinel value that can be used to
> mean "no change"?), an optional new soft mask, and an optional new
> hard mask.
> 
I see what you mean, but cpupools are really a different thing, with its
own interface, etc. I'd rather try to implement what I described above
and being consistent with the current cpupool behavior, copying what it
happens already for hard affinity to how soft affinity is handled too
(as George was saying), at least for this series.

> > > What if the application makes a call to change the cpupool, without
> > > touching the affinities ?  Should the affinities be reset
> > > automatically ?
> > 
> > I think whatever happens for hard affinities right now should be carried on.
> 
> Maybe it is a bug that it doesn't do anything.  
>
Maybe, but that just mean that we can (should) fix that even outside
from this series, right?

> I think it depends how
> we expect people to use this.  
>
Indeed. :-D

> If a caller sets the hard affinities
> and then changes the cpupool, are they supposed to always then set the
> hard affinities again to a new suitable value ?
> 
Yes and no. :-) I'll provide some examples of what happens to try
clarifying the situation as soon as I get the chance.

Thanks for the review and the nice discussion. :-)
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-15  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 19:10 [PATCH v2 00/16] Implement vcpu soft affinity for credit1 Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] xl: match output of vcpu-list with pinning syntax Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 10:50   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 11:11     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 11:14       ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 11:13     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 12:44     ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 14:19   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 11:02   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 14:24   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 14:37     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] xl: implement and enable dryrun mode for `xl vcpu-pin' Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] xl: test script for the cpumap parser (for vCPU pinning) Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] xen: fix leaking of v->cpu_affinity_saved Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 11:11   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 11:58     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:25   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] xen: sched: make space for cpu_soft_affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:03   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:14     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 10:07       ` George Dunlap
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] xen: sched: rename v->cpu_affinity into v->cpu_hard_affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:17   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] xen: derive NUMA node affinity from hard and soft CPU affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:21   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:30     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 10:52       ` George Dunlap
2013-11-15 14:17         ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] xen: sched: DOMCTL_*vcpuaffinity works with hard and soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:42   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:21     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] xen: sched: use soft-affinity instead of domain's node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:30   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-15  0:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 11:23       ` George Dunlap
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] libxc: get and set soft and hard affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:58   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 16:18     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:38   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:41     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] libxl: get and set soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:16   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:11   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 15:55     ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:25       ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-15  5:13         ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-11-15 12:02         ` George Dunlap
2013-11-15 17:29           ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15  3:45     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] xl: show soft affinity in `xl vcpu-list' Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:12   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-13 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] xl: enable setting soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] xl: enable for specifying node-affinity in the config file Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:14   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 16:12     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] libxl: automatic NUMA placement affects soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:17   ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 16:11     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 16:03   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:48     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 17:49       ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384492401.16918.124.camel@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jtweaver@hawaii.edu \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=lccycc123@gmail.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=ufimtseva@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).