From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "xen.org" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 22283: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:19:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386245944.5338.514.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386235906.20047.11.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]
On gio, 2013-12-05 at 09:31 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:13 +0000, xen.org wrote:
> 2013-12-04 17:45:01 Z executing ssh ... osstest@10.80.246.74 rm -rf /local/scratch/osstest/osstest/build.22283.build-armhf && mkdir /local/scratch/osstest/osstest/build.22283.build-armhf
> Warning: Permanently added '10.80.246.74' (RSA) to the list of known hosts.
> mkdir: cannot create directory `/local/scratch/osstest/osstest/build.22283.build-armhf': No such file or directory
>
So, about these things... Why OSSTest does no create this (and other)
dirs himself if they're not present?
Is that intentional? If yes, is that a form of safety check, a way to
tell the user "hey, perhaps you have something wrong in your config
file"?
If that is the case then, given a bit of attention is necessary when
deploying it anyway, I don't think this buys us that much more "user
friendliness", while it certainly is something annoying. Personally, I
think it should just go ahead...
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-04 19:13 [xen-unstable test] 22283: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2013-12-05 9:31 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-05 12:19 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-12-05 12:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-05 12:59 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-10 14:26 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386245944.5338.514.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).