From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com, Henri Casanova <henric@hawaii.edu>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen: sched: introduce hard and soft affinity in credit 2 scheduler
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:52:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1390294368.23576.62.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+o8iRXjC83a66t4LpzgeiNbT8DXXijSwg_MCbP3kNSTf88AuQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1568 bytes --]
On lun, 2014-01-20 at 15:02 -1000, Justin Weaver wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Dario Faggioli
> <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Allow me to comment only on the 'only one runqueue on multiple socket
> > issue' thing. I honestly think that that one is a bug, so you shouldn't
> > base your work on that behavior. To try facilitate you doing this, I'll
> > try to put together a patch for fixing such issue early next week. I'm
> > not sure wheter it will be accepted in Xen right now or when 4.5
> > development cycle opens, but at least you can apply that and work on top
> > of it.
> >
> > Would that make sense and be of any help to you?
>
> Yes, that's what I'll do (ignore the single run queue behavior).
>
Ok, cool... Have you seen this mail:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-01/msg01710.html
> About
> the bug, do you mind if I try to fix it? You probably have a lot of
> other things you're working on.
>
Please, be my very very very welcome guest! :-D
Feel free to try, and do not hesitate to ask if you think you need help.
As you say, I'm busy with other stuff right now, so I can't deal with it
right away myself, but I certainly can find 5 minutes every now and then
to (try to) advise. :-)
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-14 18:15 [PATCH v2] xen: sched: introduce hard and soft affinity in credit 2 scheduler Justin Weaver
2013-12-18 2:37 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-01-16 20:23 ` Justin Weaver
2014-01-17 22:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-01-21 1:02 ` Justin Weaver
2014-01-21 8:52 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1390294368.23576.62.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=henric@hawaii.edu \
--cc=jtweaver@hawaii.edu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).