Re: [PATCH] xl: suppress suspend/resume functions on platforms which do not support it.

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>]

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 14:54 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] xl: suppress suspend/resume functions on platforms which do not support it."):
> > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 14:27 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > ARM does not (currently) support migration, so stop offering tasty looking
> > > treats like "xl migrate".
> 
> > > Other than the additions of the #define/#ifdef there is a tiny bit of code
> > > motion ("dump-core" in the command list and core_dump_domain in the
> > > implementations) which serves to put ifdeffable bits next to each other.
> 
> I'm not a huge fan of #ifdef but this is tolerable, I think.
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> 
> I think this should go into 4.4.  It is essential that we start
> advertising lack-of-resume in 4.4 as otherwise in 4.5 we'll have to
> invent a new HAVE_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME which tells you whether the
> lack of HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME means that you can definitely
> suspend/resume.

George release acked it and so I have pushed.

I'll coordinate with you re the osstest push once this passes the xen
gate.

Ian.