From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: VIRTIO - compatibility with different virtualization solutions Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:09:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1392804568.23084.112.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <20140217132331.GA3441@olila.local.net-space.pl> <87vbwcaqxe.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WG45u-0001gH-9N for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:09:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87vbwcaqxe.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com, Daniel Kiper , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, ian@bromium.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, sasha.levin@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:56 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > For platforms using EPT, I don't think you want anything but guest > addresses, do you? No, the arguments for preventing unfettered access by backends to frontend RAM applies to EPT as well. Ian.