xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Eric Trudeau <etrudeau@broadcom.com>
Cc: "paolo.valente@unimore.it" <paolo.valente@unimore.it>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	"stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com"
	<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	"julien.grall@citrix.com" <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
	Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
	"viktor.kleinik@globallogic.com" <viktor.kleinik@globallogic.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] arch, arm32: add the XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:35:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393864505.4058.119.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FF3E5629F9FF6745ADE4EE690CEC81AD2ADBD030@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1644 bytes --]

On lun, 2014-03-03 at 16:25 +0000, Eric Trudeau wrote:

> > > Right. FTR, xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c, has this (also in
> > > construct_dom0):
> > >
> > >      /* DOM0 is permitted full I/O capabilities. */
> > >      rc |= ioports_permit_access(dom0, 0, 0xFFFF);
> > >      rc |= iomem_permit_access(dom0, 0UL, ~0UL);
> > >      rc |= irqs_permit_access(dom0, 1, nr_irqs_gsi - 1);
> > >
> > > Do you want a patch to that/similar effect?
> > 
> > Yes. Maybe a bit more smarter than permitting full I/0 caps for dom0.
> > 
> 
> Our implementation does not require Dom0 access permission in order
> for it to grant access permission to a DomU.  I suppose it wouldn't hurt
> for iomem_permit_access because we allow iomem regions to be mapped
> into multiple domains; however, I think the irqs_permit_access call keeps
> multiple domains from "owning" the same IRQ.  I might be wrong about that.
> 
As far as I understood it, it is not required here either. And in fact,
such permission is not there, and things works for Arianna too.

However, it seemed a sane check to have in place (e.g., the x86
implementation does check for that), that's why she's trying to
introduce it properly. :-)

After all, as far as I remember, you do have something like this:

    if ( current->domain->domain_id != 0 )
        break;

don't you?

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-03 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-02  0:49 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement the XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypecall for arm32 Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-02  0:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arch, arm32: add definition of paddr_bits Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-02  8:13   ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07  0:36     ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-02  0:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arch, arm32: add the XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-02  9:56   ` Julien Grall
2014-03-03 11:56     ` Dario Faggioli
2014-03-03 15:20       ` Julien Grall
2014-03-03 15:33         ` Dario Faggioli
2014-03-04  2:42           ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07  0:47             ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-03 16:25         ` Eric Trudeau
2014-03-03 16:35           ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2014-03-03 19:04             ` Eric Trudeau
2014-03-05 13:59     ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-06  3:41       ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07  0:57         ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-03 18:06   ` Eric Trudeau
2014-03-04  3:08     ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07  0:56       ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-07  3:41         ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07 19:49           ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-02  0:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] tools, libxl: handle the iomem parameter with the memory_mapping hcall Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-02 10:33   ` Julien Grall
2014-03-02 11:27     ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-03 10:32       ` Dario Faggioli
2014-03-03 15:13         ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07  0:45           ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-07  4:03             ` Julien Grall
2014-03-07 19:54               ` Arianna Avanzini
2014-03-03 11:19     ` Dario Faggioli
2014-03-07  4:05       ` Julien Grall
2014-03-02  8:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement the XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypecall for arm32 Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1393864505.4058.119.camel@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=etrudeau@broadcom.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=viktor.kleinik@globallogic.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).