xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 11/12] xen/arm: gic_events_need_delivery and irq priorities
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 16:12:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1396969969-18973-11-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404071131100.9060@kaball.uk.xensource.com>

gic_events_need_delivery should only return positive if an outstanding
pending irq has an higher priority than the currently active irq and the
priority mask.
Introduce GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE to track which one is the currently
active guest irq.
Rewrite the function by going through the priority ordered inflight and
lr_queue lists.

In gic_restore_pending_irqs replace lower priority pending (and not
active) irqs in GICH_LRs with higher priority irqs if no more GICH_LRs
are available.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

---

Changes in v7:
- fix locking for the list_empty case in gic_restore_pending_irqs;
- add in code comment;
- gic_events_need_delivery: break out of the loop as soon as we find the
active irq as inflight_irqs is ordered by priority;
- gic_events_need_delivery: break out of the loop if p->priority is
lower than mask_priority as inflight_irqs is ordered by priority;
- use find_next_zero_bit instead of find_first_zero_bit;
- in gic_restore_pending_irqs remember the last position of the inner
loop search and continue from there;
- in gic_restore_pending_irqs use a priority check to get out of the
inner loop.

Changes in v5:
- improve in code comments;
- use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead of writing my own list walker.

Changes in v4:
- in gic_events_need_delivery go through inflight_irqs and only consider
enabled irqs.
---
 xen/arch/arm/gic.c           |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h |    5 ++-
 xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h    |    3 ++
 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index e6e6f1a..9295ccf 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i)
     p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
     if ( lr & GICH_LR_ACTIVE )
     {
+        set_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status);
         /* HW interrupts cannot be ACTIVE and PENDING */
         if ( p->desc == NULL &&
              test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status) &&
@@ -735,6 +736,7 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i)
         if ( p->desc != NULL )
             p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
         clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status);
+        clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status);
         p->lr = GIC_INVALID_LR;
         if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_QUEUED, &p->status) &&
                 test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status))
@@ -763,22 +765,53 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v)
 
 static void gic_restore_pending_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
 {
-    int i;
-    struct pending_irq *p, *t;
+    int i = 0, lrs = nr_lrs;
+    struct pending_irq *p, *t, *p_r;
+    struct list_head *inflight_r;
     unsigned long flags;
 
+    spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
+
+    if ( list_empty(&v->arch.vgic.lr_pending) )
+        goto out;
+
+    inflight_r = &v->arch.vgic.inflight_irqs;
     list_for_each_entry_safe ( p, t, &v->arch.vgic.lr_pending, lr_queue )
     {
-        i = find_first_zero_bit(&this_cpu(lr_mask), nr_lrs);
-        if ( i >= nr_lrs ) return;
+        i = find_next_zero_bit(&this_cpu(lr_mask), nr_lrs, i);
+        if ( i >= nr_lrs )
+        {
+            /* No more free LRs: find a lower priority irq to evict */
+            list_for_each_entry_reverse( p_r, inflight_r, inflight )
+            {
+                inflight_r = &p_r->inflight;
+                if ( p_r->priority == p->priority )
+                    goto out;
+                if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p_r->status) &&
+                     !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p_r->status) )
+                    goto found;
+            }
+            goto out;
+
+found:
+            i = p_r->lr;
+            p_r->lr = GIC_INVALID_LR;
+            set_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_QUEUED, &p_r->status);
+            clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p_r->status);
+            gic_add_to_lr_pending(v, p_r);
+        }
 
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
         gic_set_lr(i, p, GICH_LR_PENDING);
         list_del_init(&p->lr_queue);
         set_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
+
+        lrs--;
+        if ( lrs == 0 )
+            break;
     }
 
+out:
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
 }
 
 void gic_clear_pending_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
@@ -794,8 +827,43 @@ void gic_clear_pending_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
 
 int gic_events_need_delivery(void)
 {
-    return (!list_empty(&current->arch.vgic.lr_pending) ||
-            this_cpu(lr_mask));
+    int mask_priority, lrs = nr_lrs;
+    int max_priority = 0xff, active_priority = 0xff;
+    struct vcpu *v = current;
+    struct pending_irq *p;
+    unsigned long flags;
+
+    mask_priority = (GICH[GICH_VMCR] >> GICH_VMCR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) & GICH_VMCR_PRIORITY_MASK;
+
+    spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
+
+    /* TODO: We order the guest irqs by priority, but we don't change
+     * the priority of host irqs. */
+    list_for_each_entry( p, &v->arch.vgic.inflight_irqs, inflight )
+    {
+        if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status) )
+        {
+            if ( p->priority < active_priority )
+                active_priority = p->priority;
+            break;
+        } else if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status) ) {
+            if ( p->priority < max_priority )
+                max_priority = p->priority;
+        }
+        if ( (p->priority >> 3) >= mask_priority )
+            break;
+        lrs--;
+        if ( lrs == 0 )
+            break;
+    }
+
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
+
+    if ( max_priority < active_priority &&
+         (max_priority >> 3) < mask_priority )
+        return 1;
+    else
+        return 0;
 }
 
 void gic_inject(void)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
index 71f563f..75cc2f3 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
@@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ struct pending_irq
      *
      */
 #define GIC_IRQ_GUEST_QUEUED   0
-#define GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE  1
-#define GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED  2
+#define GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE   1
+#define GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE  2
+#define GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED  3
     unsigned long status;
     struct irq_desc *desc; /* only set it the irq corresponds to a physical irq */
     int irq;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
index 5a9dc77..5d8f7f1 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
@@ -129,6 +129,9 @@
 #define GICH_LR_CPUID_SHIFT     9
 #define GICH_VTR_NRLRGS         0x3f
 
+#define GICH_VMCR_PRIORITY_MASK   0x1f
+#define GICH_VMCR_PRIORITY_SHIFT  27
+
 /*
  * The minimum GICC_BPR is required to be in the range 0-3. We set
  * GICC_BPR to 0 but we must expect that it might be 3. This means we
-- 
1.7.10.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-08 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-08 15:11 [PATCH v7 0/12] remove maintenance interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] xen/arm: no need to set HCR_VI when using the vgic to inject irqs Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] xen/arm: remove unused virtual parameter from vgic_vcpu_inject_irq Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] xen/arm: set GICH_HCR_UIE if all the LRs are in use Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] xen/arm: support HW interrupts, do not request maintenance_interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-23 12:45   ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-23 12:54     ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] xen/arm: nr_lrs should be uint8_t Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-23 12:47   ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-23 12:53     ` Julien Grall
2014-04-23 13:07       ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-23 13:13         ` Julien Grall
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] xen/arm: keep track of the GICH_LR used for the irq in struct pending_irq Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] xen/arm: s/gic_set_guest_irq/gic_raise_guest_irq Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] xen/arm: rename GIC_IRQ_GUEST_PENDING to GIC_IRQ_GUEST_QUEUED Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-23 12:52   ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-08 17:57     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-09  8:33       ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] xen/arm: second irq injection while the first irq is still inflight Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-23 13:00   ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] xen/arm: don't protect GICH and lr_queue accesses with gic.lock Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2014-04-23 13:31   ` [PATCH v7 11/12] xen/arm: gic_events_need_delivery and irq priorities Ian Campbell
2014-05-08 18:37     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-09  8:37       ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-11 14:13         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-11 16:50     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] xen/arm: introduce GIC_PRI_TO_GUEST macro Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-23 13:32   ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-23 12:50 ` [PATCH v7 0/12] remove maintenance interrupts Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1396969969-18973-11-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).