From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Spurious "NUMA placement failed, performance might be affected" message on ARM
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:36:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1398785779.16933.23.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535E4661.70700@citrix.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1632 bytes --]
On lun, 2014-04-28 at 13:15 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/04/14 12:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 11:01 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > [...]
> >> total_memory : 8184
> >> free_memory : 6933
> > [...]
> >> node: memsize memfree distances
> >> 0: 4088 3861 20
> > I think we are missing some RAM here...
> >
> > and I have now noticed that I only see this for guests which have more
> > RAM than this memfree value (+/- some slop). The guests succeed because
> > there is actually RAM available.
> >
> > I think this is enough for me to now track down the cause on the
> > hypervisor side. Thanks for your input.
> >
> > Ian.
>
> Do be aware that the memsize value is "number of pages on this node"
> which includes IO mappings of non-ram regions, and as a result memfree
> is mostly fictitious.
>
> I raised this as a concern with the hwloc code, but without any
> subsequent discussion.
>
There has been another discussion about discrepancies in total and free
memory reporting. ISTR, it was noticed at the time when I added the
support for some of these NUMA stuff in libvirt.
I don't have it handy right now... I'll see if I can fetch it back,
merge it with your observations in the hwloc thread and (re)start a
discussion about this.
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 10:37 Spurious "NUMA placement failed, performance might be affected" message on ARM Ian Campbell
2014-04-28 9:55 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-04-28 10:01 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-28 10:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-04-28 11:30 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-28 12:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-04-29 15:36 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2014-04-28 12:23 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1398785779.16933.23.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).