From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/6] xen/arm: Add save/restore support for ARM GIC V2 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:36:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1400225784.29121.8.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: <1399583908-21755-1-git-send-email-w1.huang@samsung.com> <1399583908-21755-3-git-send-email-w1.huang@samsung.com> <5374F623.6040801@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5374F623.6040801@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: Wei Huang , keir@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, yjhyun.yoo@samsung.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Wei, > > On 05/08/2014 10:18 PM, Wei Huang wrote: > > +struct hvm_arm_gich_v2 > > +{ > > + uint32_t gic_hcr; > > + uint32_t gic_vmcr; > > + uint32_t gic_apr; > > + uint32_t gic_lr[64]; > > + uint64_t event_mask; > > FYI, the field event_mask as been dropped in xen upstream [1] > > So you don't need to save it. Quite apart from it's existence in upstream Xen it is not and never was an architectural field and so shouldn't ever be saved. It's presence or absence in some struct inside Xen has no impact on that. Ian.