From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/arm: observe itarget setting in vgic_enable_irqs and vgic_disable_irqs
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401811627-4389-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406031703570.2526@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
vgic_enable_irqs should enable irq delivery to the vcpu specified by
GICD_ITARGETSR, rather than the vcpu that wrote to GICD_ISENABLER.
Similarly vgic_disable_irqs should use the target vcpu specified by
itarget to disable irqs.
Correctly initialize itargets for SPIs.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- refactor the common code in get_target_vcpu;
- unify PPI and SPI paths;
- correctly initialize itargets for SPI;
- use byte_read.
---
xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
index 1304b5e..55ed27d 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
@@ -106,7 +106,15 @@ int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].lr_queue);
}
for (i=0; i<DOMAIN_NR_RANKS(d); i++)
+ {
+ int j;
+
spin_lock_init(&d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs[i].lock);
+ /* Only delivery to CPU0 */
+ for ( j = 0 ; j < 8 ; j++ )
+ d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs[i].itargets[j] =
+ (1<<0) | (1<<8) | (1<<16) | (1<<24);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -369,6 +377,21 @@ read_as_zero:
return 1;
}
+static struct vcpu *get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq)
+{
+ int target;
+ struct vgic_irq_rank *rank;
+ struct vcpu *v_target;
+
+ rank = vgic_irq_rank(v, 1, irq/32);
+ vgic_lock_rank(v, rank);
+ target = byte_read(rank->itargets[(irq%32)/4], 0, irq % 4);
+ target = find_next_bit((const unsigned long *) &target, 8, 0);
+ v_target = v->domain->vcpu[target];
+ vgic_unlock_rank(v, rank);
+ return v_target;
+}
+
static void vgic_disable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
{
const unsigned long mask = r;
@@ -376,12 +399,14 @@ static void vgic_disable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
unsigned int irq;
unsigned long flags;
int i = 0;
+ struct vcpu *v_target;
while ( (i = find_next_bit(&mask, 32, i)) < 32 ) {
irq = i + (32 * n);
- p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
+ v_target = get_target_vcpu(v, irq);
+ p = irq_to_pending(v_target, irq);
clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status);
- gic_remove_from_queues(v, irq);
+ gic_remove_from_queues(v_target, irq);
if ( p->desc != NULL )
{
spin_lock_irqsave(&p->desc->lock, flags);
@@ -399,24 +424,26 @@ static void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
unsigned int irq;
unsigned long flags;
int i = 0;
+ struct vcpu *v_target;
while ( (i = find_next_bit(&mask, 32, i)) < 32 ) {
irq = i + (32 * n);
- p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
+ v_target = get_target_vcpu(v, irq);
+ p = irq_to_pending(v_target, irq);
set_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status);
/* We need to force the first injection of evtchn_irq because
* evtchn_upcall_pending is already set by common code on vcpu
* creation. */
- if ( irq == v->domain->arch.evtchn_irq &&
+ if ( irq == v_target->domain->arch.evtchn_irq &&
vcpu_info(current, evtchn_upcall_pending) &&
list_empty(&p->inflight) )
- vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(v, irq);
+ vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(v_target, irq);
else {
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&v_target->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
if ( !list_empty(&p->inflight) && !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) )
- gic_raise_guest_irq(v, irq, p->priority);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
+ gic_raise_guest_irq(v_target, irq, p->priority);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v_target->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
}
if ( p->desc != NULL )
{
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 16:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] vgic emulation and GICD_ITARGETSR Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-03 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/arm: ignore guest writes to GICD_ITARGETSR for SPIs Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-03 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-03 16:25 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-03 16:07 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2014-06-03 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/arm: observe itarget setting in vgic_enable_irqs and vgic_disable_irqs Julien Grall
2014-06-06 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] vgic emulation and GICD_ITARGETSR Ian Campbell
2014-06-06 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-09 10:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-10 11:16 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-10 14:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1401811627-4389-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).