From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: jbeulich@suse.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com
Cc: keir@xen.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org,
dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 14/19] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for PV guests
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:37:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404225480-2664-15-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404225480-2664-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Add support for handling PMU interrupts for PV guests.
VPMU for the interrupted VCPU is unloaded until the guest issues XENPMU_flush
hypercall. This allows the guest to access PMU MSR values that are stored in
VPMU context which is shared between hypervisor and domain, thus avoiding
traps to hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
xen/include/public/pmu.h | 7 +++
2 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
index 37cc48b..364ec4e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
@@ -80,40 +80,169 @@ static void __init parse_vpmu_param(char *s)
void vpmu_lvtpc_update(uint32_t val)
{
- struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(current);
+ struct vcpu *v = current;
+ struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc = PMU_APIC_VECTOR | (val & APIC_LVT_MASKED);
- apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc);
+
+ /* Postpone APIC updates for PV(H) guests if PMU interrupt is pending */
+ if ( is_hvm_domain(v->domain) ||
+ !(vpmu->xenpmu_data && (vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags & PMU_CACHED)) )
+ apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc);
}
int vpmu_do_wrmsr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content)
{
- struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(current);
+ struct vcpu *v = current;
+ struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
if ( !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ON) )
return 0;
if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops && vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_wrmsr )
- return vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_wrmsr(msr, msr_content);
+ {
+ int ret = vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_wrmsr(msr, msr_content);
+
+ /*
+ * We may have received a PMU interrupt during WRMSR handling
+ * and since do_wrmsr may load VPMU context we should save
+ * (and unload) it again.
+ */
+ if ( !is_hvm_domain(v->domain) &&
+ (vpmu->xenpmu_data &&
+ (vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags & PMU_CACHED)) )
+ {
+ vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE);
+ vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_save(v);
+ vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE | VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
+ }
+ return ret;
+ }
return 0;
}
int vpmu_do_rdmsr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content)
{
- struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(current);
+ struct vcpu *v = current;
+ struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
if ( !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ON) )
return 0;
if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops && vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_rdmsr )
- return vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_rdmsr(msr, msr_content);
+ {
+ int ret = vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_rdmsr(msr, msr_content);
+
+ if ( !is_hvm_domain(v->domain) &&
+ (vpmu->xenpmu_data &&
+ (vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags & PMU_CACHED)) )
+ {
+ vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE);
+ vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_save(v);
+ vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE | VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
+ }
+ return ret;
+ }
return 0;
}
+static struct vcpu *choose_hwdom_vcpu(void)
+{
+ struct vcpu *v;
+ unsigned idx = smp_processor_id() % hardware_domain->max_vcpus;
+
+ if ( hardware_domain->vcpu == NULL )
+ return NULL;
+
+ v = hardware_domain->vcpu[idx];
+
+ /*
+ * If index is not populated search downwards the vcpu array until
+ * a valid vcpu can be found
+ */
+ while ( !v && idx-- )
+ v = hardware_domain->vcpu[idx];
+
+ return v;
+}
+
int vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
- struct vcpu *v = current;
- struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
+ struct vcpu *curr_vcpu, *v = current;
+ struct vpmu_struct *vpmu;
+
+ /* dom0 will handle interrupt for special domains (e.g. idle domain) */
+ if ( v->domain->domain_id >= DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED )
+ {
+ v = choose_hwdom_vcpu();
+ if ( !v )
+ return 0;
+
+ curr_vcpu = current;
+ }
+ else
+ curr_vcpu = v;
+
+ vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
+ if ( !is_hvm_domain(v->domain) )
+ {
+ /* PV(H) guest or dom0 is doing system profiling */
+ const struct cpu_user_regs *gregs;
+
+ if ( !vpmu->xenpmu_data )
+ return 0;
+
+ if ( vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags & PMU_CACHED )
+ return 1;
+
+ if ( is_pvh_domain(curr_vcpu->domain) &&
+ !vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_interrupt(regs) )
+ return 0;
+
+ /* PV guest will be reading PMU MSRs from xenpmu_data */
+ vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE | VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
+ vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_save(v);
+ vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE | VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
+
+ /* Store appropriate registers in xenpmu_data */
+ if ( is_pv_32bit_domain(curr_vcpu->domain) )
+ {
+ /*
+ * 32-bit dom0 cannot process Xen's addresses (which are 64 bit)
+ * and therefore we treat it the same way as a non-priviledged
+ * PV 32-bit domain.
+ */
+ struct compat_cpu_user_regs *cmp;
+
+ gregs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
+
+ cmp = (void *)&vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu.r.regs;
+ XLAT_cpu_user_regs(cmp, gregs);
+ }
+ else if ( !is_hardware_domain(curr_vcpu->domain) &&
+ !is_idle_vcpu(curr_vcpu) )
+ {
+ /* PV(H) guest */
+ gregs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
+ memcpy(&vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu.r.regs,
+ gregs, sizeof(struct cpu_user_regs));
+ }
+ else
+ memcpy(&vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu.r.regs,
+ regs, sizeof(struct cpu_user_regs));
+
+ vpmu->xenpmu_data->domain_id = curr_vcpu->domain->domain_id;
+ vpmu->xenpmu_data->vcpu_id = curr_vcpu->vcpu_id;
+ vpmu->xenpmu_data->pcpu_id = smp_processor_id();
+
+ vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags |= PMU_CACHED;
+ apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
+ vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc |= APIC_LVT_MASKED;
+
+ send_guest_vcpu_virq(v, VIRQ_XENPMU);
+
+ return 1;
+ }
if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops )
{
@@ -232,7 +361,9 @@ void vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v)
local_irq_enable();
/* Only when PMU is counting, we load PMU context immediately. */
- if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_RUNNING) )
+ if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_RUNNING) ||
+ (!is_hvm_domain(v->domain) &&
+ vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags & PMU_CACHED) )
return;
if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops && vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_load )
@@ -523,6 +654,12 @@ long do_xenpmu_op(int op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_pmu_params_t) arg)
vpmu_lvtpc_update(current->arch.vpmu.xenpmu_data->pmu.l.lapic_lvtpc);
ret = 0;
break;
+ case XENPMU_flush:
+ current->arch.vpmu.xenpmu_data->pmu_flags &= ~PMU_CACHED;
+ vpmu_lvtpc_update(current->arch.vpmu.xenpmu_data->pmu.l.lapic_lvtpc);
+ vpmu_load(current);
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
}
return ret;
diff --git a/xen/include/public/pmu.h b/xen/include/public/pmu.h
index 1439e95..ba0abbd 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/pmu.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/pmu.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#define XENPMU_init 4
#define XENPMU_finish 5
#define XENPMU_lvtpc_set 6
+#define XENPMU_flush 7 /* Write cached MSR values to HW */
/* ` } */
/* Parameters structure for HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op call */
@@ -59,6 +60,12 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_pmu_params_t);
*/
#define XENPMU_FEATURE_INTEL_BTS 1
+/*
+ * PMU MSRs are cached in the context so the PV guest doesn't need to trap to
+ * the hypervisor
+ */
+#define PMU_CACHED 1
+
/* Shared between hypervisor and PV domain */
struct xen_pmu_data {
uint32_t domain_id;
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-01 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 14:37 [PATCH v8 00/19] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 01/19] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 02/19] x86/VPMU: Set MSR bitmaps only for HVM/PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 13:48 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 03/19] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu macros a bit more efficient Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 04/19] intel/VPMU: Clean up Intel VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-28 16:20 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 05/19] vmx: Merge MSR management routines Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 14:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 06/19] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 07/19] intel/VPMU: MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL should be initialized to zero Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 08/19] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 14:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 09/19] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 10/19] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 15:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-28 16:29 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 16:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-28 17:13 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-29 6:19 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-29 14:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-29 15:21 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 11/19] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV(H) guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 12/19] x86/VPMU: When handling MSR accesses, leave fault injection to callers Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 16:26 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 13/19] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 16:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-07-29 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 14/19] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for " Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 15/19] x86/VPMU: Merge vpmu_rdmsr and vpmu_wrmsr Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-29 7:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-29 14:35 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 16/19] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-29 7:55 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-29 14:49 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 17/19] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 18/19] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-29 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-01 14:38 ` [PATCH v8 19/19] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-29 8:07 ` [PATCH v8 00/19] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Jan Beulich
2014-07-29 15:00 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1404225480-2664-15-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).