From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, xisisu@gmail.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
xumengpanda@gmail.com, lichong659@gmail.com,
dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] libxl for rt scheduler
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:08:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405091329.29306.464.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405054198-29106-4-git-send-email-mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2218 bytes --]
On ven, 2014-07-11 at 00:49 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +static int sched_rt_domain_get(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> + libxl_domain_sched_params *scinfo)
> +{
> + struct xen_domctl_sched_rt_params sdom;
> + int rc, i;
> +
> + rc = xc_sched_rt_domain_get(CTX->xch, domid, &sdom);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + LOGE(ERROR, "getting domain sched rt");
> + return ERROR_FAIL;
> + }
> +
> + libxl_domain_sched_params_init(scinfo);
> + scinfo->sched = LIBXL_SCHEDULER_RT;
> + scinfo->rt.max_vcpus = LIBXL_XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS;
> + /*TODO: alloc array with exact num of dom's vcpus; and use GCNEW_ARRAY()*/
>
Indeed. That, or just do an hypercall for each VCPU, at least as a first
step.
> + scinfo->rt.vcpus = (libxl_vcpu *)
> + malloc( sizeof(libxl_vcpu) * scinfo->rt.max_vcpus );
>
Yes, you said it yourself, I see: GCNEW_ARRAY() and no malloc() in
libxl.
> + if ( !scinfo->rt.vcpus ){
> + LOGE(ERROR, "Allocate lib_vcpu array fails\n");
> + return ERROR_INVAL;
> + }
> + scinfo->rt.num_vcpus = sdom.num_vcpus;
> + for( i = 0; i < sdom.num_vcpus; ++i)
> + {
> + scinfo->rt.vcpus[i].period = sdom.vcpus[i].period;
> + scinfo->rt.vcpus[i].budget = sdom.vcpus[i].budget;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define SCHED_RT_VCPU_PARAMS_MAX 4294967295 /* 2^32-1 */
> +
I don't like the name. I'd go for something like
SCHED_RT_VCPU_PERIOD_MAX and SCHED_RT_VCPU_BUDGET_MAX.
You well can define both to the same value, of course.
As per the value, yes, even if we turn the interface in usecs, 2^32
usecs is still ~4000 secs, which ought to be enough as a period or
budget for everyone! :-)
For the rest of this file, I think I'll wait for v2, as the interface is
subject to be changed.
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 4:49 Introduce rt real-time scheduler for Xen Meng Xu
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rt: Add rt scheduler to hypervisor Meng Xu
2014-07-11 14:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 14:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-11 15:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 15:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-11 15:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-16 17:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-17 10:12 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-17 15:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-18 5:46 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-18 18:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/4] xl for rt scheduler Meng Xu
2014-07-11 11:02 ` Wei Liu
2014-07-11 14:59 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 15:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:25 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-13 12:58 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-14 7:40 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-14 9:31 ` Wei Liu
2014-07-17 15:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] libxl " Meng Xu
2014-07-11 11:05 ` Wei Liu
2014-07-11 15:08 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2014-07-12 18:16 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-14 10:38 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-17 15:34 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-17 15:36 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-18 11:05 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/4] libxc " Meng Xu
2014-07-11 14:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:23 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 16:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-12 19:46 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-17 15:29 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-17 15:34 ` George Dunlap
2014-07-17 22:16 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-18 9:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-18 9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-18 12:11 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-18 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-18 10:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 10:50 ` Introduce rt real-time scheduler for Xen Wei Liu
2014-07-11 11:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:14 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 16:19 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405091329.29306.464.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=lichong659@gmail.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=xisisu@gmail.com \
--cc=xumengpanda@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).