From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: cpufreq implementation for OMAP under xen hypervisor. Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:51:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1408726264.17003.31.camel@citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: jinsong.liu@alibaba-inc.com, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn , Tim Deegan , xen-devel , jbeulich@suse.com, jacob.shin@amd.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:31 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > One thing to keep in mind is that although P states are obviously an > Intel concept I'm not sure about P-states but C-states at least even if they were originally an Intel thing seem to have become more of an ACPI thing these days and I think they are being used by the ARM ACPI stuff too. (or am I confused?) Ian.