xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, julien.grall@linaro.org,
	patches@apm.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com,
	Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] xen arm/arm64: minor improvement in smp_send_call_function_mask()
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:48:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408961920-3729-1-git-send-email-anup.patel@linaro.org> (raw)

Currently, smp_send_call_function_mask() function implemented
by xen arm/arm64 will use IPI to call function on current CPU.

This means that current smp_send_call_function_mask() will do
the following on current CPU:
Trigger SGI for current CPU => Xen takes interrupt on current CPU
=> IPI interrupt handler will call smp_call_function_interrupt()

This patch improves the above by straight away calling
smp_call_function_interrupt() for current CPU. This is very
similar to smp_send_call_function_mask() implemented by Xen x86.

Changes since v1:
 - Drop the check protecting send_SGI_mask() call

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
---
 xen/arch/arm/smp.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smp.c b/xen/arch/arm/smp.c
index 30203b8..917d490 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/smp.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/smp.c
@@ -19,7 +19,18 @@ void smp_send_event_check_mask(const cpumask_t *mask)
 
 void smp_send_call_function_mask(const cpumask_t *mask)
 {
-    send_SGI_mask(mask, GIC_SGI_CALL_FUNCTION);
+    cpumask_t target_mask;
+
+    cpumask_andnot(&target_mask, mask, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()));
+
+    send_SGI_mask(&target_mask, GIC_SGI_CALL_FUNCTION);
+
+    if ( cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mask) )
+    {
+        local_irq_disable();
+        smp_call_function_interrupt();
+        local_irq_enable();
+    }
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5

             reply	other threads:[~2014-08-25 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 10:18 Anup Patel [this message]
2014-08-26 21:02 ` [PATCH v2] xen arm/arm64: minor improvement in smp_send_call_function_mask() Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1408961920-3729-1-git-send-email-anup.patel@linaro.org \
    --to=anup.patel@linaro.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@apm.com \
    --cc=pranavkumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).