From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@globallogic.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Interrupt latency measurement technique
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 02:07:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409188042.28009.96.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH_mUMMTkfrT5vuMSqXKGwOYS_WuCb9ztzGU2d-StB8YsLrZ5w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 12:14 +0300, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to measure IRQ latency introduced by Xen: (GIC -> Xen IRQ
> handler -> Dom0 IRQ handler)
> I need to know how many time I spend in Xen IRQ handler.
>
> Can someone comment - is the following algorithm works:
>
> - in function xen/arch/arm/gic.c: gic_interrupt() store timer counter value:
> xen_timer_val = READ_SYSREG64(CNTPCT_EL0) - READ_SYSREG64(CNTVOFF_EL2)
>
> - in any IRQ handler in dom0 store timer counter value:
> dom0_timer_val = READ_SYSREG64(CNTPCT_EL0)
>
> - calculate time diff in nanoseconds:
> time_diff_ns = ticks_to_ns(dom0_timer_val - xen_timer_val)
>
> Using this technique I measured display IRQ latency and got about
> - 20 to 30 usec latency on 1 GHz MPU frequency
> - 10 to 20 usec latencyon 1.5 GHz MPU frequency
>
> Are these numbers expectable?
How do they compare to just native Linux?
One thing to watch out for is the virtualised offset of dom0's timer, I
can't remember if this is expected to be zero or non-zero, if the latter
then you will need to subtract it out.
> Can this technique be used?
One thing which it misses is the time from the IRQ line going high to
reaching gic_interrupt. I don't know if that is a concern for you.
Not sure what embedded folks usually do here (you probably know better
than me). One technique I've heard of is to inject an interrupt via an
external GPIO input and toggle another GPIO in response, then you can
use a scope to observe the difference.
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-27 9:14 [RFC] Interrupt latency measurement technique Andrii Tseglytskyi
2014-08-27 10:07 ` Andrii Tseglytskyi
2014-08-29 18:07 ` Jonathan Fraser
2014-08-29 20:11 ` Andrii Tseglytskyi
2014-08-28 1:07 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-08-28 7:58 ` Andrii Tseglytskyi
2014-08-28 17:47 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409188042.28009.96.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=andrii.tseglytskyi@globallogic.com \
--cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).