From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable bisection] complete
 test-armhf-armhf-xl
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:42:47 +0100
Message-ID: <1409247767.21481.12.camel@citrix.com>
References: <E1XMjzx-0006gW-9s@osstest.cam.xci-test.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1XMjzx-0006gW-9s@osstest.cam.xci-test.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "xen.org" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Chunyan Liu <cyliu@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, keir@xen.org, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:39 +0100, xen.org wrote:
> branch xen-unstable
> xen branch xen-unstable
> job test-armhf-armhf-xl
> test guest-start
> 
> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
> Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
> Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
> 
> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
> 
>   Bug is in tree:  xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
>   Bug introduced:  11dffa2359e8a2629490c14c029c7c7c777b3e47
>   Bug not present: ceba2249707724594b268482da34a0725adbe6da
> 
> 
>   commit 11dffa2359e8a2629490c14c029c7c7c777b3e47
>   Author: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@suse.com>
>   Date:   Mon Jul 7 14:34:33 2014 +0800
>   
>       xen: pass kernel initrd to qemu

Hrm, I'm not sure how this has broken arm and not x86, since it seems
rather agnostic.

There's an instance of the bug at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/30005/test-armhf-armhf-xl/info.html

I'll try and take a look but I'm at a conference so if someone else got
there first that would be wonderful.

Ian.