From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PING] various patches Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:06:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1410973600.23505.52.camel@citrix.com> References: <541998780200007800035AB3@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIgq-0006EA-Ig for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:06:48 +0000 In-Reply-To: <541998780200007800035AB3@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Ian Campbell , Keir Fraser , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:19 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > "REST"-maintainers, > > is there any chance I could gets acks or otherwise on > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg01751.html This looks like x86 rather than rest? In any case it seems like Andrew is looking into it, and if he is happy with it I think that should be sufficient for you to go ahead. > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02105.html I don't see anything wrong with this, but I'm not sure if the reasons for Keir's original concerns have now gone away or the circumstances have changed etc. > Also, does anyone have comments on the approach taken in > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02103.html > > (see namely the not to be committed part of the description)? The bit about migration to an older hypervisor not working? I think you are right that we don't care to support that. Ian.