xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>,
	Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>,
	Prasun Kapoor <prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>,
	manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	psawargaonkar@linaro.org, Matt.Evans@arm.com,
	Dave.Martin@arm.com, manish jaggi <manishjaggi.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC + Queries] Flow of PCI passthrough in ARM
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 10:01:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412326870.423.14.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410021757040.17038@kaball.uk.xensource.com>

On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 17:59 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > >> >> using this the ITS emulation code in xen is able to trap ITS command
> > > >> >> writes by driver.
> > > >> >> But we are facing a problem now, where your help is needed
> 
> Actually  given that you are talking about the virtual ITS, why do you
> need the real Device ID or Stream ID of the passthrough device in the
> guest at all?  Shouldn't you just be generating a bunch of virtual IDs
> instead?
> 
> Let's take a step back: why do you need *real* IDs to program a
> *virtual* ITS?

Ack, I'm having a great deal of trouble figuring out why the guest would
ever see a physical hardware identifier of any kind.

Ian.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-03  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-18 11:34 [RFC + Queries] Flow of PCI passthrough in ARM manish jaggi
2014-09-22 10:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-09-22 11:09   ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-24 10:56     ` manish jaggi
2014-09-24 10:53   ` manish jaggi
2014-09-24 12:13     ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 14:10     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-09-24 18:32       ` manish jaggi
2014-09-25 10:27         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-01 10:37           ` manish jaggi
2014-10-02 16:41             ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-02 16:59               ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-03  9:01                 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-10-03  9:33                   ` manish jaggi
2014-10-03  9:32                 ` manish jaggi
2014-10-06 11:05                   ` manish jaggi
2014-10-06 14:11                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-06 15:38                       ` Ian Campbell
2014-10-06 17:39                         ` manish jaggi
2014-10-06 17:39                       ` manish jaggi
2014-10-07 18:17                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-08 11:46                           ` manish jaggi
2014-10-08 12:46                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-10-08 13:37                               ` manish jaggi
2014-10-08 13:45                                 ` Ian Campbell
2014-10-08 13:47                                   ` manish jaggi
2014-10-08 13:58                                     ` Ian Campbell
2014-10-08 14:51                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-10-20 13:30                                       ` manish jaggi
2014-10-20 14:54                                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-06 15:28                                           ` manish jaggi
2014-11-06 15:48                                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-06 15:55                                               ` manish jaggi
2014-11-06 16:02                                                 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-06 16:07                                                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-06 16:20                                                     ` manish jaggi
2014-11-07 10:29                                                       ` Julien Grall
2014-11-06 19:41                                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1412326870.423.14.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=Matt.Evans@arm.com \
    --cc=anup.patel@linaro.org \
    --cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=manishjaggi.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=psawargaonkar@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).