From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH for-xen-4.5] tools/mkrpm: improve version.release handling Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:11:43 +0000 Message-ID: <1415095903.11486.9.camel@citrix.com> References: <1412694063-29616-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <20141103142436.GA23458@aepfle.de> <1415024987.24785.13.camel@citrix.com> <20141103144755.GA28870@aepfle.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141103144755.GA28870@aepfle.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Olaf Hering Cc: George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:47 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:24 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, George Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > How difficult would it be to have this be something sensible like, > > > > "changesets since last tag"? > > > > > > Very difficult, because one does changes without commit, runs 'make > > > rpmball' and expects that rpm -Fvh *.rpm continues to work. > > > > Isn't that what "rpm -Uvh" is for? > > No, thats for fresh install. Isn't that -ivh? > -F installs whats already there. Does rpm --force -Fvh not work? Ian.