From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-4.5] xen: Bump Xen interface for Xen-4.5
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:08:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415102930.11486.40.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5458CDF70200007800044C30@mail.emea.novell.com>
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 12:00 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.11.14 at 12:50, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > c/s fce5281c "x86/mem_access: Deprecate the HVM mem_access ops" removes the
> > structures associated with xen_hvm_{get,set}_mem_access from the Xen public
> > API.
> >
> > While these were toolstack hypercalls and documented as liable to change in
> > the future, it causes build issues for certain tools (valgrind, strace).
> >
> > As HVM ops have no specific interface version, the main Xen interface
> > version
> > needs to be bumped to compensate.
>
> Content-wise I don't really object to this patch, but I view it as
> merely cosmetic rather than fixing anything: Tool stack interfaces
> are declared to be volatile just because we want to avoid exactly
> this need for bumping versions or anything when altering or
> dropping them. If there are out of tree consumers of them, it is
> their responsibility to keep up with our changes (or have their
> own clones of the canonical headers).
>
> Also we didn't bother incrementing the version just because of a
> release on earlier occasions: 3.3 and 3.4 as well as 4.0 and 4.1
> shared interface versions, yet especially in the case of 4.1 I'm
> pretty certain even without explicitly checking that there were
> tool stack interface changes.
I always thought __XEN_(LATEST_)INTERFACE_VERSION__ were more to do with
API rather than ABI, i.e. it gets used to revert
__HYPERVISOR_sched_op_compat into providing __HYPERVISOR_sched_op for
older consumers and things like that.
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-04 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-04 11:44 [PATCH for-4.5] xen: Bump several interface versions in preparation for Xen-4.5 Andrew Cooper
2014-11-04 11:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-11-04 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 for-4.5] xen: Bump Xen interface " Andrew Cooper
2014-11-04 12:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 12:08 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-11-04 12:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 12:07 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415102930.11486.40.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).