From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Formal Vote for changes to Xen Project Security Policy encoded in [PATCH v2 SECURITY-POLICY */9] (vote ends next Wed, Feb 11th) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:23:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1422973400.9323.103.camel@citrix.com> References: <201501291217.t0TCHIgs024117@aserz7022.oracle.com> <29EFAD61-815C-4F11-B17D-2C0DB93C1C94@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YIeOL-0006fh-1K for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:23:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <29EFAD61-815C-4F11-B17D-2C0DB93C1C94@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Lars Kurth Cc: keir Fraser , Ian Jackson , tim deegan , Jan Beulich , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 12:09 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > the patch series for modifications to > http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html has gone it's second > revision and is ready for voting. In accordance with our governance, > committers are eligible to vote. Others can of course voice their > opinion. [...] > As there seems to be no objections, in the discussion leading to this > patch series, I think we don't need to have a voting form. Replying to > this mail with +1, 0 -1 "comment" should suffice. Should there be > objections and they are specific to a specific change above, please > refer to the specific change. +1.