From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main
 recipe of nested test job
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:40:12 +0100
Message-ID: <1434012012.30003.115.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1432631304-27347-1-git-send-email-longtaox.pang@intel.com>
	<1432631304-27347-7-git-send-email-longtaox.pang@intel.com>
	<21880.23264.813171.606123@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<86C3224E41A7434B904EC364302132D80E4BFEC4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <86C3224E41A7434B904EC364302132D80E4BFEC4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "Pang, LongtaoX" <longtaox.pang@intel.com>
Cc: "wei.liu2@citrix.com" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, "Hu,
	Robert" <robert.hu@intel.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 07:41 +0000, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:42 PM
> > To: Pang, LongtaoX
> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Ian.Campbell@citrix.com; wei.liu2@citrix.com; Hu,
> > Robert
> > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested
> > test job
> > 
> > longtao.pang writes ("[OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe
> > of nested test job"):
> > > The ident and guestname are same of 'nestedl1' for L1 guest VM.
> > 
> > This is going in the right direction.
> > 
> > I think arrangements need to be made to capture the logs for
> > nestedl1.
> > 
> I am sorry, what logs do you mean?

I think the ones gathered from a host by ts-logs-capture, which should
be made to run against an L1 hypervisor and added to the job recipe.

> > I think some extra +s in the l2 install and start operations might be
> > useful, because the testid probably doesn't need to mention nestedl1.
> > 
> I am sorry, do you mean that I should add '+' for l2 installation, 
> such as ' ts-debian-hvm-install + nestedl1 + nestedl2' ? 

You can use standalone --dry-run to see all the testid's generated by
your job and then adjust the +'s until they are as desired (in this case
Ian is suggesting to omit nestedl1 from the testid).

Ian.