From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: JBeulich@suse.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com,
dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: [PATCH v25 14/15] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:44:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434739486-1611-15-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434739486-1611-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Add support for privileged PMU mode (XENPMU_MODE_ALL) which allows privileged
domain (dom0) profile both itself (and the hypervisor) and the guests. While
this mode is on profiling in guests is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 13 +++++++++++++
xen/include/public/pmu.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
index 9d6ca93..3ad0b94 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
@@ -108,8 +108,10 @@ int vpmu_do_msr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content,
const struct arch_vpmu_ops *ops;
int ret = 0;
- if ( likely(vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_OFF) )
- goto nop;
+ if ( likely(vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_OFF) ||
+ ((vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) &&
+ !is_hardware_domain(current->domain)) )
+ goto nop;
vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(curr);
ops = vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops;
@@ -164,8 +166,12 @@ void vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
struct vlapic *vlapic;
u32 vlapic_lvtpc;
- /* dom0 will handle interrupt for special domains (e.g. idle domain) */
- if ( sampled->domain->domain_id >= DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED )
+ /*
+ * dom0 will handle interrupt for special domains (e.g. idle domain) or,
+ * in XENPMU_MODE_ALL, for everyone.
+ */
+ if ( (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) ||
+ (sampled->domain->domain_id >= DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED) )
{
sampling = choose_hwdom_vcpu();
if ( !sampling )
@@ -179,16 +185,17 @@ void vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
return;
/* PV(H) guest */
- if ( !is_hvm_vcpu(sampling) )
+ if ( !is_hvm_vcpu(sampling) || (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) )
{
const struct cpu_user_regs *cur_regs;
uint64_t *flags = &vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu.pmu_flags;
- domid_t domid = DOMID_SELF;
+ domid_t domid;
if ( !vpmu->xenpmu_data )
return;
if ( is_pvh_vcpu(sampling) &&
+ !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) &&
!vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_interrupt(regs) )
return;
@@ -205,6 +212,11 @@ void vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
else
*flags = PMU_SAMPLE_PV;
+ if ( sampled == sampling )
+ domid = DOMID_SELF;
+ else
+ domid = sampled->domain->domain_id;
+
/* Store appropriate registers in xenpmu_data */
/* FIXME: 32-bit PVH should go here as well */
if ( is_pv_32bit_vcpu(sampling) )
@@ -233,7 +245,8 @@ void vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
if ( (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_SELF) )
cur_regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
- else if ( !guest_mode(regs) && is_hardware_domain(sampling->domain) )
+ else if ( !guest_mode(regs) &&
+ is_hardware_domain(sampling->domain) )
{
cur_regs = regs;
domid = DOMID_XEN;
@@ -472,7 +485,9 @@ void vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING "VPMU: Initialization failed for %pv\n", v);
/* Intel needs to initialize VPMU ops even if VPMU is not in use */
- if ( !is_priv_vpmu && (ret || (vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_OFF)) )
+ if ( !is_priv_vpmu &&
+ (ret || (vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_OFF) ||
+ (vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_ALL)) )
{
spin_lock(&vpmu_lock);
vpmu_count--;
@@ -525,7 +540,8 @@ static int pvpmu_init(struct domain *d, xen_pmu_params_t *params)
struct page_info *page;
uint64_t gfn = params->val;
- if ( vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_OFF )
+ if ( (vpmu_mode == XENPMU_MODE_OFF) ||
+ ((vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) && !is_hardware_domain(d)) )
return -EINVAL;
if ( (params->vcpu >= d->max_vcpus) || (d->vcpu[params->vcpu] == NULL) )
@@ -645,12 +661,14 @@ long do_xenpmu_op(unsigned int op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_pmu_params_t) arg)
{
case XENPMU_mode_set:
{
- if ( (pmu_params.val & ~(XENPMU_MODE_SELF | XENPMU_MODE_HV)) ||
+ if ( (pmu_params.val &
+ ~(XENPMU_MODE_SELF | XENPMU_MODE_HV | XENPMU_MODE_ALL)) ||
(hweight64(pmu_params.val) > 1) )
return -EINVAL;
/* 32-bit dom0 can only sample itself. */
- if ( is_pv_32bit_vcpu(current) && (pmu_params.val & XENPMU_MODE_HV) )
+ if ( is_pv_32bit_vcpu(current) &&
+ (pmu_params.val & (XENPMU_MODE_HV | XENPMU_MODE_ALL)) )
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock(&vpmu_lock);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
index d2ff1a9..ac5622f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
@@ -2654,6 +2654,10 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
case MSR_AMD_FAM15H_EVNTSEL0...MSR_AMD_FAM15H_PERFCTR5:
if ( vpmu_msr || (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) )
{
+ if ( (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) &&
+ !is_hardware_domain(v->domain) )
+ break;
+
if ( vpmu_do_wrmsr(regs->ecx, msr_content, 0) )
goto fail;
}
@@ -2777,6 +2781,15 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
case MSR_AMD_FAM15H_EVNTSEL0...MSR_AMD_FAM15H_PERFCTR5:
if ( vpmu_msr || (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) )
{
+
+ if ( (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) &&
+ !is_hardware_domain(v->domain) )
+ {
+ /* Don't leak PMU MSRs to unprivileged domains */
+ regs->eax = regs->edx = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+
if ( vpmu_do_rdmsr(regs->ecx, &val) )
goto fail;
diff --git a/xen/include/public/pmu.h b/xen/include/public/pmu.h
index 7a45783..1149678 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/pmu.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/pmu.h
@@ -52,10 +52,13 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_pmu_params_t);
* - XENPMU_MODE_SELF: Guests can profile themselves
* - XENPMU_MODE_HV: Guests can profile themselves, dom0 profiles
* itself and Xen
+ * - XENPMU_MODE_ALL: Only dom0 has access to VPMU and it profiles
+ * everyone: itself, the hypervisor and the guests.
*/
#define XENPMU_MODE_OFF 0
#define XENPMU_MODE_SELF (1<<0)
#define XENPMU_MODE_HV (1<<1)
+#define XENPMU_MODE_ALL (1<<2)
/*
* PMU features:
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-19 18:44 [PATCH v25 00/15] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 01/15] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 02/15] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 03/15] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 04/15] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-22 15:10 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-22 16:10 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-23 8:26 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 2:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-07 7:16 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-07-09 1:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 05/15] x86/VPMU: Initialize VPMUs with __initcall Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-08 11:48 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-07-09 6:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 06/15] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV(H) guests Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-08 12:20 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 07/15] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-22 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-08 5:51 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 08/15] x86/VPMU: When handling MSR accesses, leave fault injection to callers Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-08 6:11 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 09/15] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 10/15] x86/VPMU: Use pre-computed masks when checking validity of MSRs Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-08 6:49 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 11/15] VPMU/AMD: Check MSR values before writing to hardware Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-08 15:35 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 12/15] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for PV(H) guests Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-22 15:20 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 12:19 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 13/15] x86/VPMU: Merge vpmu_rdmsr and vpmu_wrmsr Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-09 6:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-19 18:44 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-07-09 6:13 ` [PATCH v25 14/15] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Tian, Kevin
2015-07-09 12:38 ` Dietmar Hahn
2015-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v25 15/15] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-08 8:03 ` [PATCH v25 00/15] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Jan Beulich
2015-07-10 9:13 ` Dietmar Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434739486-1611-15-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).