From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 COLOPre 23/26] docs/libxl: Introduce COLO_CONTEXT to support migration v2 colo streams Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:44:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1435747475.21469.255.camel@citrix.com> References: <1435213552-10556-1-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1435213552-10556-24-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1435660932.21469.85.camel@citrix.com> <55935A36.5000706@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55935A36.5000706@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Yang Hongyang Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, Andrew Cooper , yunhong.jiang@intel.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, rshriram@cs.ubc.ca, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 11:10 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: > >> + > >> + 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 octet > >> + +------------------------+------------------------+ > >> + | control_id | padding | > >> + +------------------------+------------------------+ > >> + > >> +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> +Field Description > >> +------------ --------------------------------------------------- > >> +control_id 0x00000000: New checkpoint > > > > I think we already have a checkpoint record type, don't we? > > Yes, but the meaning is diffrent, the checkpoint record means the > end of a checkpoint, this means a new checkpoint is needed. The wording needs to be improved then. Ian.