From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 59721: regressions - trouble:
 broken/fail/pass
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:48:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1437382097.32450.1.camel@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-59721-mainreport@xen.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <osstest-59721-mainreport@xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sun, 2015-07-19 at 10:19 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 59721 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59721/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 58965

I think we have considered discounting i386 qemu-dm as a thing we care
about, in which case we could force push this change since this was the
only fail..


> 
> Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386  3 host-install(3)         broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd  3 host-install(3)     broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386  3 host-install(3)       broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel  3 host-install(3)   broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl            3 host-install(3)           broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  3 host-install(3)    broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64  3 host-install(3)    broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  3 host-install(3)      broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  3 host-install(3)      broken pass in 59699
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 14 guest-start.2     fail in 59699 pass in 59721
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl           9 debian-install              fail pass in 59699

Some of these host-install fails are a bit worrying, but not a blocker
to a forced push IMHO.

> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  21d9b079e53805b68047d60d28cde224d09bbb40
> baseline version:
>  xen                  c40317f11b3f05e7c06a2213560c8471081f2662
> 
> Last test of basis    58965  2015-06-29 02:08:30 Z   20 days
> Failing since         58974  2015-06-29 15:11:59 Z   19 days   25 attempts
> Testing same since    59681  2015-07-18 00:10:50 Z    1 days    3 attempts

Ian.