xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: jbeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, keir@xen.org,
	Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 1/2] x86/microcode: Cleanup int type usage for cpu numbers
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:11:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439320288-12279-2-git-send-email-aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439320288-12279-1-git-send-email-aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>

CPU numbers can't be negative. Fixing the microcode*
files to properly use unsigned type in this patch.

No functional change is introduced.

Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode.c        |  6 +++---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c    | 12 +++++++-----
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c  | 15 ++++++++-------
 xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h |  9 +++++----
 xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
index 091d5d1..c20bde6 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct microcode_info {
     char buffer[1];
 };
 
-static void __microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
+static void __microcode_fini_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
 
@@ -203,14 +203,14 @@ static void __microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
     memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
 }
 
-static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
+static void microcode_fini_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
     spin_lock(&microcode_mutex);
     __microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
     spin_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
 }
 
-int microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu)
+int microcode_resume_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
     int err;
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
index f79b397..2717479 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct mpbhdr {
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock);
 
 /* See comment in start_update() for cases when this routine fails */
-static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
+static int collect_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 {
     struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data[cpu];
 
@@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static bool_t find_equiv_cpu_id(const struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table,
     return 0;
 }
 
-static bool_t microcode_fits(const struct microcode_amd *mc_amd, int cpu)
+static bool_t microcode_fits(const struct microcode_amd *mc_amd,
+                             unsigned int cpu)
 {
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
     const struct microcode_header_amd *mc_header = mc_amd->mpb;
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ static bool_t microcode_fits(const struct microcode_amd *mc_amd, int cpu)
     return 1;
 }
 
-static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
+static int apply_microcode(unsigned int cpu)
 {
     unsigned long flags;
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
@@ -347,7 +348,8 @@ static int container_fast_forward(const void *data, size_t size_left, size_t *of
     return 0;
 }
 
-static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu, const void *buf, size_t bufsize)
+static int cpu_request_microcode(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
+                                 size_t bufsize)
 {
     struct microcode_amd *mc_amd, *mc_old;
     size_t offset = 0;
@@ -511,7 +513,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu, const void *buf, size_t bufsize)
     return error;
 }
 
-static int microcode_resume_match(int cpu, const void *mc)
+static int microcode_resume_match(unsigned int cpu, const void *mc)
 {
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
     struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = uci->mc.mc_amd;
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
index b54cd71..0a5f403 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct extended_sigtable {
 /* serialize access to the physical write to MSR 0x79 */
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock);
 
-static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
+static int collect_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 {
     struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data[cpu_num];
     uint64_t msr_content;
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 }
 
 static inline int microcode_update_match(
-    int cpu_num, const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
+    unsigned int cpu_num, const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
     int sig, int pf)
 {
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu_num);
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc)
  * return 1 - found update
  * return < 0 - error
  */
-static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, int cpu)
+static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, unsigned int cpu)
 {
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
     const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc;
@@ -277,12 +277,12 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, int cpu)
     return 1;
 }
 
-static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
+static int apply_microcode(unsigned int cpu)
 {
     unsigned long flags;
     uint64_t msr_content;
     unsigned int val[2];
-    int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
+    unsigned int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu_num);
 
     /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
@@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static long get_next_ucode_from_buffer(void **mc, const u8 *buf,
     return offset + total_size;
 }
 
-static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu, const void *buf, size_t size)
+static int cpu_request_microcode(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
+                                 size_t size)
 {
     long offset = 0;
     int error = 0;
@@ -391,7 +392,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu, const void *buf, size_t size)
     return error;
 }
 
-static int microcode_resume_match(int cpu, const void *mc)
+static int microcode_resume_match(unsigned int cpu, const void *mc)
 {
     return get_matching_microcode(mc, cpu);
 }
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
index 00a672a..23ea954 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
@@ -7,10 +7,11 @@ struct cpu_signature;
 struct ucode_cpu_info;
 
 struct microcode_ops {
-    int (*microcode_resume_match)(int cpu, const void *mc);
-    int (*cpu_request_microcode)(int cpu, const void *buf, size_t size);
-    int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
-    int (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
+    int (*microcode_resume_match)(unsigned int cpu, const void *mc);
+    int (*cpu_request_microcode)(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
+                                 size_t size);
+    int (*collect_cpu_info)(unsigned int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
+    int (*apply_microcode)(unsigned int cpu);
     int (*start_update)(void);
 };
 
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
index b9a00aa..f507f5e 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ int wrmsr_hypervisor_regs(uint32_t idx, uint64_t val);
 
 void microcode_set_module(unsigned int);
 int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void), unsigned long len);
-int microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu);
+int microcode_resume_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 
 enum get_cpu_vendor {
    gcv_host_early,
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-11 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-11 19:11 [PATCH V4 0/2] Update microcode driver Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-08-11 19:11 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2015-08-11 19:11 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] x86, amd_ucode: Skip microcode updates for final levels Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-08-12  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-13 22:51     ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-08-20 22:45 ` [PATCH V4 0/2] Update microcode driver Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1439320288-12279-2-git-send-email-aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).