From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Kun Cheng <chengkunck@gmail.com>
Cc: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Could Xen hyperviosr be able to invoke Linux systemcalls?
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:27:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440008849.2772.16.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO3v1VRmcA5rrMnAS7GLTEVwNNSkcOHqWXivDEufK2T=vMikcA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1416 bytes --]
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 00:47 +0000, Kun Cheng wrote:
> Live migration between nodes is perhaps the easiest way. But it also
> has draw backs mainly because that migration is coarse-grained.
>
What I'm saying is that you can, as a first step, look at the migration
code and implement (let's call it so) page moving in a similar way. That
does not mean that you'd have to *always* move all the pages, like a
migration does, you well can move only one page, or a bunch of them.
It's the mechanism for implementing that you should take inspiration
from.
> Supposing that a VM has multiple VCPUs, if only some of them are
> moved to another node or some other nodes. Then it will be tough to
> decide which one should be the target node for the live migration.
>
A policy needs to be defined, sure. But we're not talking about that,
we're talking about, after you've decided what to do, how to do that.
> However, I also think live migration is the best 'first step'. But
> finally a fine grained memory migration is the destination. By the
> way, I am currently digging the migration code. ;)
>
Great! :-)
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-15 1:31 Could Xen hyperviosr be able to invoke Linux systemcalls? Kun Cheng
2015-08-16 16:16 ` Frediano Ziglio
2015-08-17 0:55 ` Kun Cheng
2015-08-17 19:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-08-18 1:18 ` Kun Cheng
2015-08-18 9:16 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-08-19 0:47 ` Kun Cheng
2015-08-19 18:27 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440008849.2772.16.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=chengkunck@gmail.com \
--cc=freddy77@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).