From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Commit moratorium Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:42:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1441377736.26292.528.camel@citrix.com> References: <20150903162517.GO18474@zion.uk.xensource.com> <55E967F8020000780009F838@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20150904115219.GR18474@zion.uk.xensource.com> <55E9A5D2020000780009FA39@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20150904121217.GB27133@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1441371380.26292.491.camel@citrix.com> <20150904131924.GF27133@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXsCA-0005RK-3C for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:42:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20150904131924.GF27133@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: keir@xen.org, tim@xen.org, Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 14:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy > > > with > > > that one-liner applied today. > > > > I will do so. > > > > If we are having a push to staging anyway then I also have these > > candidates > > in my folder: > > > > tools/xen-access: use PRI_xen_pfn > > xen/dt: Handle correctly node with interrupt-map in > > dt_for_each_irq_map > > build: update top-level make help > > MAINTAINERS: tools/ocaml: update David Scott's email address > > public/io/netif.h: move and amend multicast control documentation > > > > The last one is docs only, but isn't yet acked (I've not read it myself > > either). > > > > Would you rather I pushed these now at the same time as the arm64 fix > > or > > wait until later? > > > > At the same time - since most are docs update and two patches that touch > code are well understood. All done.