From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:04:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1441976663.3549.26.camel@citrix.com> References: <1441368548-43465-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOBk-0002R3-Bu for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:16:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1441368548-43465-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roger Pau Monne , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 14:08 +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > This series is split in the following order: > > - Patches from 1 to 10 switch HVM domain contruction to use the xc_dom_* > family of functions, like they are used to build PV domains. This batch > of patches can go in regardless of the status of the rest of the series > IMHO, and in fact would help me quite a lot with the rebasing. In principal I agree, however they are a pretty major refactoring which would potentially make cherry-picking of subsequent patches for 4.6 more difficult, so I'd like to hold off for a few weeks until we are getting towards the final 4.6 release candidates. Sorry. Ian.