xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "osstest service owner" <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	"Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>,
	"David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:10:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441984246.3549.82.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441185512.26292.111.camel@citrix.com>

ping for 3.10.y and 3.14.y

Thanks,
Ian.

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks]
> 
> TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e
> ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was added in v4.0)
> needs $something doing to it, either s/mutex/spinlock/ or (more likely)
> backporting of 1401c00e59e too.
> 
> Looking at LTS:
> 
> 3.18.y:	  Backported both.
> 3.16.y:	  Has backported neither
> 3.14.y:	* Only backported 30b03d05e074
> 3.12.y:	  Has backported neither
> 3.10.y:	* Only backported 30b03d05e074
> 3.4.y:	  Has backported neither
> 3.2.y:	  Has backported neither
> 
> So AFAICT 3.14.y and 3.10.y need fixes, probably following 3.18 and
> backporting 1401c00e59e.
> 
> 3.16/12/4/2 might need to be careful if they subsequently pick up
> 30b03d05.
> 
> See below for the build log error.
> 
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:05 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 10:57 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64
> > > -i386
> > > -xl-qcow2"):
> > > > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 20:02 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > > >   commit 9e6c072a69d87100808d16279d60e9f857291340
> > > > >   Author: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <
> > > > > marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com
> > > > > > 
> > > > >   Date:   Fri Jun 26 03:28:24 2015 +0200
> > > > >   
> > > > >       xen/gntdevt: Fix race condition in gntdev_release()
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure what to make of this.
> > > > 
> > > > The qcow2 test is one of the only ones I'd expect to be exercising 
> > > > gntdev
> > > > (most tests use LVM+blkback), which explains why this particular 
> > > > commit 
> > > > is
> > > > apparently seeing issues due to this particular change.
> > > 
> > > (You mean `which explains why this particular _test_ is [failing]',
> > > I think.)
> > 
> > Indeed.
> > 
> > > The host serial log in one of the confirmation tests of 9e6c072a
> > > shows
> > > serious trouble:
> > > 
> > >  http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60893/test-amd64-i3
> > > 86
> > > -xl-qcow2/serial-huxelrebe1.log
> > > 
> > >  Aug 26 19:36:51.841068 [  738.050547] BUG: unable to handle kernel
> > >  NULL pointer dereference at 00000014
> > > 
> > >  Aug 26 19:36:56.753068 [  738.050594] IP: []
> > >  __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x33/0x70
> > > 
> > > And the immediately preceding confirmation flight, which got a pass
> > > on
> > > 9e6c072a~1, seems fine:
> > > 
> > >  http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60892/test-amd64-i3
> > > 86
> > > -xl-qcow2/serial-huxelrebe1.log
> > > 
> > > But, it's difficult to see how that gntdev fix would be responsible
> > > for the bug.  Perhaps it changes the order in which certain things
> > > happen so as to expose another bug.
> > 
> > Or perhaps there was a fix and/or change in behaviour in the
> > mmunotifier
> > stuff which the patch relied on but which isn't in 3.14?
> 
> Looking at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60949/'s buil
> d
> jobs:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60949/build-amd64
> -pvops/5.ts-kernel-build.log contains:
> 
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c: In function ‘gntdev_release’:
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c:532:2: warning: passing argument 1 of
> ‘mutex_lock’
> from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
> In file included from include/linux/notifier.h:13:0,
>                  from include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:6,
>                  from include/linux/mmzone.h:821,
>                  from include/linux/gfp.h:5,
>                  from include/linux/kmod.h:22,
>                  from include/linux/module.h:13,
>                  from drivers/xen/gntdev.c:24:
> include/linux/mutex.h:157:13: note: expected ‘struct mutex *’ but
> argument is of type ‘struct spinlock_t *’
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c:539:2: warning: passing argument 1 of
> ‘mutex_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
> In file included from include/linux/notifier.h:13:0,
>                  from include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:6,
>                  from include/linux/mmzone.h:821,
>                  from include/linux/gfp.h:5,
>                  from include/linux/kmod.h:22,
>                  from include/linux/module.h:13,
>                  from drivers/xen/gntdev.c:24:
> include/linux/mutex.h:174:13: note: expected ‘struct mutex *’ but
> argument is of type ‘struct spinlock_t *’
> 
> Which is somehow a warning and not a build failure.
> 
> Ian.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-11 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-26 20:02 [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2 osstest service owner
2015-09-01  9:19 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-01  9:38   ` Fabio Fantoni
2015-09-01 10:10     ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-01  9:57   ` Ian Jackson
2015-09-01 10:05     ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-02  9:03       ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-02  9:18       ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-03 11:05         ` Luis Henriques
2015-09-03 11:16           ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-09-03 12:21             ` Luis Henriques
2015-09-11 15:10         ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-09-11 15:51           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-09-11 15:55             ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-26 17:30               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-09-28  9:27                 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-28  9:43                   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-08 22:14         ` Ben Hutchings
2015-10-09  9:15           ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-12 10:11           ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-10-12 12:56             ` Ben Hutchings
2015-10-12 13:01               ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441984246.3549.82.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).