From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.6 v4 2/3] xl/libxl: disallow saving a
 guest with vNUMA configured
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:53:57 +0100
Message-ID: <1441986837.3549.93.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1441979409-3064-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com>
	<1441979409-3064-3-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com>
	<1441980035.3549.41.camel@citrix.com>
	<20150911141415.GN1695@zion.uk.xensource.com>
	<1441981461.3549.54.camel@citrix.com>
	<20150911143149.GO1695@zion.uk.xensource.com>
	<1441983913.3549.79.camel@citrix.com>
	<20150911150934.GR1695@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=689d88a86=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>)
	id 1ZaQeH-0005o0-IJ
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:54:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20150911150934.GR1695@zion.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:09 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:

> > >  Note that virtual NUMA for PV guest is not yet supported, because
> > >  there is an issue with cpuid handling that affects PV virtual NUMA.
> > > +Further more, guest with virtual NUMA cannot be saved or migrated
> > 
> > I _think_ (but am not 100% sure) that in the sense you mean it is
> > "Furthermore". I don't think "Further more," actually means anything.
> > 
> > I can fix as I commit.
> > 
> 
> Yes please.

I went with:
+Furthermore, guests with virtual NUMA cannot be saved or migrated
+because the migration stream does not preserve node information.

I've applied all three patches in this series to staging and 4.6. The
conflict you mentioned elsewhere (patch #1) was just the presence of
 xc_domain_soft_reset in staging but not staging-4.6. I resolved it, I
don't think I can have gotten it wrong, but do check ;-)

Ian.