From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:41:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1442414477.18856.112.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1442410530-9665-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<1442410530-9665-8-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<1442411655.18856.73.camel@citrix.com>
	<22009.30091.72697.925087@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1442412458.18856.82.camel@citrix.com>
	<22009.32507.106446.655458@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=6948b2dab=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>)
	id 1ZcDti-00025W-9u
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:41:22 +0000
In-Reply-To: <22009.32507.106446.655458@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:38 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility"):
> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Also of course this statement was, with my original patch, wrong,
> > > because osstest.git didn't contain a copy of any version of the
> > > vanilla GPL.  I have added a copy of GPL-3 to this patch.
> > 
> > NB all the text in the patch talks about v2, FWIW...
> 
> You mean it talks about `version 2 or, at your option, any later
> version'.  Clearly we don't want to be pushing GPL-2 at this stage, so
> GPL-3 is the right licence version text to include.  But likewise we
> don't want to rule out distribution under GPL-2.

Yep, just wanted to check it was intentional.