From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen/arm: vgic-v3: Correctly retrieve
 the vCPU associated to a re-distributor
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:28:40 +0100
Message-ID: <1443536920.16718.106.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1443472296-6671-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<1443472296-6671-3-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<1443534960.16718.85.camel@citrix.com> <560A9CED.70901@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=7074e5ba0=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>)
	id 1Zgvte-0005JP-Ry
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:28:47 +0000
In-Reply-To: <560A9CED.70901@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 29/09/15 14:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 21:31 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > When the guest is accessing the re-distributor, Xen retrieves the
> > > base
> > > of the re-distributor using a mask based on the stride.
> > > 
> > > Although, when the stride contains multiple set, the corresponding
> > > mask
> > 
> >                                                  ^bits?
> 
> I guess you mean "multiple bits set" here?

I meant "multiple set bits" but that works too.

Ian.