xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: Trim the matrix of disk format flights
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:42:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443624164.16718.195.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443621840-17400-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>

On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 15:04 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We don't need to test every combination of toolstack, architecture,
> and disk format.  We don't expect many architecture-specific bugs in
> the per-disk-format code in the toolstack layers.
> 
> We _do_ want to test every combination of toolstack and disk format
> (since the format configuration machinery is toolstack specific) and a
> reasonable selection of architectures for each disk format (since
> arch-specific bugs in actual underlying disk drivers are a
> possibility).
> 
> The implementation strategy is for do_pv_debian_tests to select a
> particular architecture for each combination of toolstack and format.
> (Because the architecture is actually in an outer loop, we recalculate
> that selection multiple times, and skip inner iterations for the other
> architectures.  This is all in bash code so the wasted computation is
> not particularly important.)
> 
> We have a safety catch which spots if any architecture is entirely
> untested in any of these combinations; this would happen if a new
> architecture is introduced elsewhere and not added to the list.  We do
> not have a safety catch which spots when a (toolstack,format)
> combination becomes untested due to deletion of an architecture.
> (That would be more fiddly to implement without restructuring.)
> 
> We list armhf twice because we would like to do at least as many ARM
> as x86 tests (particularly given our current workload and capacity).
> 
> The result is that the set of generated jobs is adjusted as follows:
> 
>    keep  test-amd64-i386-xl-raw
>      -   test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd
>      -   test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2
>      -   test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw
>      -   test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd
>      -   test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2
>      -   test-amd64-amd64-xl-raw
>      -   test-amd64-amd64-xl-vhd
>    keep  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2
>      -   test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw
>    keep  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd
>      -   test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qcow2
>      -   test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw
>    keep  test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd
>      -   test-armhf-armhf-xl-qcow2
>    keep  test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw
>      -   test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-vhd
>    keep  test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2
> 
> (Where `-' means `drop this job'.)
> 
> Or to look at it another way:
> 
>                          i386   amd64   armhf
> 
>                  raw     keep     -       -
>                  vhd       -      -     keep
>                  qcow2     -    keep      -
> 
>          libvirt raw       -      -     keep
>          libvirt vhd       -    keep      -
>          libvirt qcow2     -      -     keep
> 
> I have diffed standalone-generate-dump-flight-runvars output before
> and after and it looks plausible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-30 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-30 14:04 [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: Trim the matrix of disk format flights Ian Jackson
2015-09-30 14:42 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-10-06 15:59   ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1443624164.16718.195.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).