From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: RFC: change to 6 months release cycle
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:55:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444046100.11707.196.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5612642A.30407@suse.com>
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 13:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 01:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 12:23 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > we can pick a stable tree every X releases etc etc.
> >
> > I think switching to an LTS style model, i.e. only supporting 1/N for
> > longer than it takes to release the next major version might be
> > interesting
> > to consider. I'm thinking e.g. of N=4 with a 6 month cycle.
> >
> > I think some of our downstreams (i.e. distros) would like this, since
> > it
> > gives them releases which are supported for a length of time more like
> > their own release cycles.
>
> And again there will be a rush to get a feature in at the end of each
> Nth cycle, as it will end up in the long-term stable version...
I actually think there is plenty of stuff which people just want in _some_
release.
> > On a completely different tack, one way of looking at this is that
> > there
> > are 2 releases in a given 18 month period with 9 month cycle vs 4 in
> > the 6
>
> Huh?
>
> 4 * 6 = 24, not 18!
Oops yes. 3*6=18 just makes my point more valid though I think.
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 17:43 RFC: change to 6 months release cycle Wei Liu
2015-10-02 17:52 ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 18:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-05 9:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-05 10:01 ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-06 15:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-02 18:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-03 1:04 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-05 9:55 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-05 10:19 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 10:29 ` George Dunlap
2015-10-05 10:42 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 11:04 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 11:23 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 11:37 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 12:52 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 13:31 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 13:51 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 14:07 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 14:50 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 11:44 ` Steven Haigh
2015-10-05 13:05 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 13:05 ` George Dunlap
2015-10-05 13:21 ` Steven Haigh
2015-10-05 16:22 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-06 13:03 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-06 13:12 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 11:44 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-05 11:51 ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-05 11:55 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-10-05 12:55 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 13:51 ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-05 14:30 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-05 11:51 ` Steven Haigh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444046100.11707.196.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).