From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Survey Results - Part 1 : Improving Xen Project
 Governance and Conventions
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:29:53 +0100
Message-ID: <1444123793.5302.74.camel@citrix.com>
References: <0F60A9E1-7AE3-4FEC-9549-7B7F85EAA583@gmail.com>
	<5612A60302000078000A82D7@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
	<A75F9CF0-60DE-49AD-9DC2-DCBE9186E7ED@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <A75F9CF0-60DE-49AD-9DC2-DCBE9186E7ED@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 23:31 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> I am not sure whether the hierarchy would require everyone to ACK. As far
> as I understand Linux does this without (but I suppose the ACK is
> replaced by a pull request the next level up the hierarchy, which sort of
> is like one).  

That's my understanding, by forwarding it to the next level a maintainer is
in effect acking it (in fact they would normally add a S-o-b per 3(c) of
the DCO).

Ian.