From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: remove unused wrappers for python Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:26:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1444145211.5302.221.camel@citrix.com> References: <1444128368-31585-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <20151006111849.GW29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> <5613B1A2.2030800@suse.com> <20151006113902.GY29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1444138837.5302.174.camel@citrix.com> <5613DFF9.6000309@suse.com> <1444144260.5302.212.camel@citrix.com> <5613E706.2060807@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5613E706.2060807@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Juergen Gross , Wei Liu Cc: Andrew Cooper , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > > > > And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's > > > > > possible to > > > > > load shared library into python interpreter using "dl" module in > > > > > 2.7 > > > > > and > > > > > "ctypes" module in 3.x. > > > > > > > > Possible, but not especially convenient since you need to convert > > > > the C > > > > prototype manually, plus the result is not necessarily very > > > > "pythonic". > > > > > > > > I could totally see why people would prefer these bindings (or an > > > > argument > > > > for us providing a ctypes based wrapper). > > > > > > How often is such a debugging interface being used? Please consider > > > the amount of code (my patch removed nearly 3000 lines of code!) and > > > the availability of the xl wrapper. > > > > My understanding was that this was used by the "xen-bugtool" stuff in > > XenServer, so for actual functionality (gathering debug info) and not > > debugging (I supposed that the reference to being used for debugging was > > due to the name of the tool). > > And this functionality isn't available via the xl bindings? I don't know, we'll have to wait for those who are using it to chime in. Ian.