From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: RFC: LTS and stable release scheme Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:30:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1444149038.5302.248.camel@citrix.com> References: <20151006110758.GV29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1444137005.5302.163.camel@citrix.com> <20151006162544.GA6138@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjV8V-0005JN-2Z for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:30:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20151006162544.GA6138@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: jgross@suse.com, Lars Kurth , netwiz@crc.id.au, George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, cardoe@cardoe.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:25 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > It could be an alias for all maintainers. Making sure a patch contains > CC stable@ is good enough for searching through git log for candidates. Ah yes, I suppose the Linux folks use git log --grep=stable@vger a lot, which does a bunch of the work for certain cases. But beyond that grep-fodder I'm not convinced that the actual alias itself as an email address is going to be any help at all. Ian.